dma-buf: Fix SET_NAME ioctl uapi

The uapi is the same on 32 and 64 bit, but the number isn't. Everyone
who botched this please re-read:

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.4-preprc-cpu/ioctl/botching-up-ioctls.html

Also, the type argument for the ioctl macros is for the type the void
__user *arg pointer points at, which in this case would be the
variable-sized char[] of a 0 terminated string. So this was botched in
more than just the usual ways.

Cc: Sumit Semwal <[email protected]>
Cc: Chenbo Feng <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg Hackmann <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Martin Liu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Martin Liu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Martin Liu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <[email protected]>
  [sumits: updated some checkpatch fixes, corrected author email]
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]

Author: danvet-intel

drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c

@@ -388,7 +388,8 @@ static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
 
 		return ret;
 
-	case DMA_BUF_SET_NAME:
+	case DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A:
+	case DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B:
 		return dma_buf_set_name(dmabuf, (const char __user *)arg);
 
 	default:

include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h

@@ -39,6 +39,12 @@ struct dma_buf_sync {
 
 #define DMA_BUF_BASE		'b'
 #define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 0, struct dma_buf_sync)
+
+/* 32/64bitness of this uapi was botched in android, there's no difference
+ * between them in actual uapi, they're just different numbers.
+ */
 #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, const char *)
+#define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u32)
+#define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u64)
 
 #endif