ASoC: dapm: Don't fold register value changes into notifications

DAPM tracks and reports the value presented to the user from DAPM controls
separately to the register value, these may diverge during initialisation
or when an autodisable control is in use.

When writing DAPM controls we currently report that a change has occurred
if either the DAPM value or the value stored in the register has changed,
meaning that if the two are out of sync we may appear to report a spurious
event to userspace. Since we use this folded in value for nothing other
than the value reported to userspace simply drop the folding in of the
register change.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>

Author: broonie

sound/soc/soc-dapm.c

@@ -3437,7 +3437,6 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_volsw(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 			update.val = val;
 			card->update = &update;
 		}
-		change |= reg_change;
 
 		ret = soc_dapm_mixer_update_power(card, kcontrol, connect,
 						  rconnect);
@@ -3539,7 +3538,6 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 			update.val = val;
 			card->update = &update;
 		}
-		change |= reg_change;
 
 		ret = soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, item[0], e);