Skip to content

Commit b04df3d

Browse files
Florian Westphalummakynes
authored andcommitted
netfilter: nf_tables: do not defer rule destruction via call_rcu
nf_tables_chain_destroy can sleep, it can't be used from call_rcu callbacks. Moreover, nf_tables_rule_release() is only safe for error unwinding, while transaction mutex is held and the to-be-desroyed rule was not exposed to either dataplane or dumps, as it deactives+frees without the required synchronize_rcu() in-between. nft_rule_expr_deactivate() callbacks will change ->use counters of other chains/sets, see e.g. nft_lookup .deactivate callback, these must be serialized via transaction mutex. Also add a few lockdep asserts to make this more explicit. Calling synchronize_rcu() isn't ideal, but fixing this without is hard and way more intrusive. As-is, we can get: WARNING: .. net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:5515 nft_set_destroy+0x.. Workqueue: events nf_tables_trans_destroy_work RIP: 0010:nft_set_destroy+0x3fe/0x5c0 Call Trace: <TASK> nf_tables_trans_destroy_work+0x6b7/0xad0 process_one_work+0x64a/0xce0 worker_thread+0x613/0x10d0 In case the synchronize_rcu becomes an issue, we can explore alternatives. One way would be to allocate nft_trans_rule objects + one nft_trans_chain object, deactivate the rules + the chain and then defer the freeing to the nft destroy workqueue. We'd still need to keep the synchronize_rcu path as a fallback to handle -ENOMEM corner cases though. Reported-by: [email protected] Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/T/ Fixes: c03d278 ("netfilter: nf_tables: wait for rcu grace period on net_device removal") Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <[email protected]>
1 parent f36b019 commit b04df3d

File tree

2 files changed

+15
-21
lines changed

2 files changed

+15
-21
lines changed

include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h

Lines changed: 0 additions & 4 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1103,7 +1103,6 @@ struct nft_rule_blob {
11031103
* @name: name of the chain
11041104
* @udlen: user data length
11051105
* @udata: user data in the chain
1106-
* @rcu_head: rcu head for deferred release
11071106
* @blob_next: rule blob pointer to the next in the chain
11081107
*/
11091108
struct nft_chain {
@@ -1121,7 +1120,6 @@ struct nft_chain {
11211120
char *name;
11221121
u16 udlen;
11231122
u8 *udata;
1124-
struct rcu_head rcu_head;
11251123

11261124
/* Only used during control plane commit phase: */
11271125
struct nft_rule_blob *blob_next;
@@ -1265,7 +1263,6 @@ static inline void nft_use_inc_restore(u32 *use)
12651263
* @sets: sets in the table
12661264
* @objects: stateful objects in the table
12671265
* @flowtables: flow tables in the table
1268-
* @net: netnamespace this table belongs to
12691266
* @hgenerator: handle generator state
12701267
* @handle: table handle
12711268
* @use: number of chain references to this table
@@ -1285,7 +1282,6 @@ struct nft_table {
12851282
struct list_head sets;
12861283
struct list_head objects;
12871284
struct list_head flowtables;
1288-
possible_net_t net;
12891285
u64 hgenerator;
12901286
u64 handle;
12911287
u32 use;

net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c

Lines changed: 15 additions & 17 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1596,7 +1596,6 @@ static int nf_tables_newtable(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nfnl_info *info,
15961596
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&table->sets);
15971597
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&table->objects);
15981598
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&table->flowtables);
1599-
write_pnet(&table->net, net);
16001599
table->family = family;
16011600
table->flags = flags;
16021601
table->handle = ++nft_net->table_handle;
@@ -3987,8 +3986,11 @@ void nf_tables_rule_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_rule *rule)
39873986
kfree(rule);
39883987
}
39893988

3989+
/* can only be used if rule is no longer visible to dumps */
39903990
static void nf_tables_rule_release(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_rule *rule)
39913991
{
3992+
lockdep_commit_lock_is_held(ctx->net);
3993+
39923994
nft_rule_expr_deactivate(ctx, rule, NFT_TRANS_RELEASE);
39933995
nf_tables_rule_destroy(ctx, rule);
39943996
}
@@ -5757,6 +5759,8 @@ void nf_tables_deactivate_set(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_set *set,
57575759
struct nft_set_binding *binding,
57585760
enum nft_trans_phase phase)
57595761
{
5762+
lockdep_commit_lock_is_held(ctx->net);
5763+
57605764
switch (phase) {
57615765
case NFT_TRANS_PREPARE_ERROR:
57625766
nft_set_trans_unbind(ctx, set);
@@ -11695,19 +11699,6 @@ static void __nft_release_basechain_now(struct nft_ctx *ctx)
1169511699
nf_tables_chain_destroy(ctx->chain);
1169611700
}
1169711701

11698-
static void nft_release_basechain_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
11699-
{
11700-
struct nft_chain *chain = container_of(head, struct nft_chain, rcu_head);
11701-
struct nft_ctx ctx = {
11702-
.family = chain->table->family,
11703-
.chain = chain,
11704-
.net = read_pnet(&chain->table->net),
11705-
};
11706-
11707-
__nft_release_basechain_now(&ctx);
11708-
put_net(ctx.net);
11709-
}
11710-
1171111702
int __nft_release_basechain(struct nft_ctx *ctx)
1171211703
{
1171311704
struct nft_rule *rule;
@@ -11722,11 +11713,18 @@ int __nft_release_basechain(struct nft_ctx *ctx)
1172211713
nft_chain_del(ctx->chain);
1172311714
nft_use_dec(&ctx->table->use);
1172411715

11725-
if (maybe_get_net(ctx->net))
11726-
call_rcu(&ctx->chain->rcu_head, nft_release_basechain_rcu);
11727-
else
11716+
if (!maybe_get_net(ctx->net)) {
1172811717
__nft_release_basechain_now(ctx);
11718+
return 0;
11719+
}
11720+
11721+
/* wait for ruleset dumps to complete. Owning chain is no longer in
11722+
* lists, so new dumps can't find any of these rules anymore.
11723+
*/
11724+
synchronize_rcu();
1172911725

11726+
__nft_release_basechain_now(ctx);
11727+
put_net(ctx->net);
1173011728
return 0;
1173111729
}
1173211730
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__nft_release_basechain);

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)