block, bfq: fix uaf for bfqq in bic_set_bfqq()

After commit 64dc8c7 ("block, bfq: fix possible uaf for 'bfqq->bic'"),
bic->bfqq will be accessed in bic_set_bfqq(), however, in some context
bic->bfqq will be freed, and bic_set_bfqq() is called with the freed
bic->bfqq.

Fix the problem by always freeing bfqq after bic_set_bfqq().

Fixes: 64dc8c7 ("block, bfq: fix possible uaf for 'bfqq->bic'")
Reported-and-tested-by: Shinichiro Kawasaki <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>

Author: YuKuai-huawei

block/bfq-cgroup.c

@@ -769,8 +769,8 @@ static void __bfq_bic_change_cgroup(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
 				 * request from the old cgroup.
 				 */
 				bfq_put_cooperator(sync_bfqq);
-				bfq_release_process_ref(bfqd, sync_bfqq);
 				bic_set_bfqq(bic, NULL, true);
+				bfq_release_process_ref(bfqd, sync_bfqq);
 			}
 		}
 	}

block/bfq-iosched.c

@@ -5425,9 +5425,11 @@ static void bfq_check_ioprio_change(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, struct bio *bio)
 
 	bfqq = bic_to_bfqq(bic, false);
 	if (bfqq) {
-		bfq_release_process_ref(bfqd, bfqq);
+		struct bfq_queue *old_bfqq = bfqq;
+
 		bfqq = bfq_get_queue(bfqd, bio, false, bic, true);
 		bic_set_bfqq(bic, bfqq, false);
+		bfq_release_process_ref(bfqd, old_bfqq);
 	}
 
 	bfqq = bic_to_bfqq(bic, true);