virtio_blk: fix snprintf truncation compiler warning

Commit 4e04005 ("virtio-blk: support polling I/O") triggers the
following gcc 13 W=1 warnings:

drivers/block/virtio_blk.c: In function ‘init_vq’:
drivers/block/virtio_blk.c:1077:68: warning: ‘%d’ directive output may be truncated writing between 1 and 11 bytes into a region of size 7 [-Wformat-truncation=]
 1077 |                 snprintf(vblk->vqs[i].name, VQ_NAME_LEN, "req_poll.%d", i);
      |                                                                    ^~
drivers/block/virtio_blk.c:1077:58: note: directive argument in the range [-2147483648, 65534]
 1077 |                 snprintf(vblk->vqs[i].name, VQ_NAME_LEN, "req_poll.%d", i);
      |                                                          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/block/virtio_blk.c:1077:17: note: ‘snprintf’ output between 11 and 21 bytes into a destination of size 16
 1077 |                 snprintf(vblk->vqs[i].name, VQ_NAME_LEN, "req_poll.%d", i);
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This is a false positive because the lower bound -2147483648 is
incorrect. The true range of i is [0, num_vqs - 1] where 0 < num_vqs <
65536.

The code mixes int, unsigned short, and unsigned int types in addition
to using "%d" for an unsigned value. Use unsigned short and "%u"
consistently to solve the compiler warning.

Cc: Suwan Kim <[email protected]>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/[email protected]/
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>

Author: stefanhaRH

drivers/block/virtio_blk.c

@@ -1019,12 +1019,12 @@ static void virtblk_config_changed(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk)
 {
 	int err;
-	int i;
+	unsigned short i;
 	vq_callback_t **callbacks;
 	const char **names;
 	struct virtqueue **vqs;
 	unsigned short num_vqs;
-	unsigned int num_poll_vqs;
+	unsigned short num_poll_vqs;
 	struct virtio_device *vdev = vblk->vdev;
 	struct irq_affinity desc = { 0, };
 
@@ -1068,13 +1068,13 @@ static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < num_vqs - num_poll_vqs; i++) {
 		callbacks[i] = virtblk_done;
-		snprintf(vblk->vqs[i].name, VQ_NAME_LEN, "req.%d", i);
+		snprintf(vblk->vqs[i].name, VQ_NAME_LEN, "req.%u", i);
 		names[i] = vblk->vqs[i].name;
 	}
 
 	for (; i < num_vqs; i++) {
 		callbacks[i] = NULL;
-		snprintf(vblk->vqs[i].name, VQ_NAME_LEN, "req_poll.%d", i);
+		snprintf(vblk->vqs[i].name, VQ_NAME_LEN, "req_poll.%u", i);
 		names[i] = vblk->vqs[i].name;
 	}