Skip to content

Commit be8e9eb

Browse files
JasonXingkuba-moo
authored andcommitted
net-timestamp: introduce SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER flag
introduce a new flag SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER in the receive path. User can set it with SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE to filter out rx software timestamp report, especially after a process turns on netstamp_needed_key which can time stamp every incoming skb. Previously, we found out if an application starts first which turns on netstamp_needed_key, then another one only passing SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE could also get rx timestamp. Now we handle this case by introducing this new flag without breaking users. Quoting Willem to explain why we need the flag: "why a process would want to request software timestamp reporting, but not receive software timestamp generation. The only use I see is when the application does request SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE | SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE." Similarly, this new flag could also be used for hardware case where we can set it with SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE, then we won't receive hardware receive timestamp. Another thing about errqueue in this patch I have a few words to say: In this case, we need to handle the egress path carefully, or else reporting the tx timestamp will fail. Egress path and ingress path will finally call sock_recv_timestamp(). We have to distinguish them. Errqueue is a good indicator to reflect the flow direction. Suggested-by: Willem de Bruijn <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
1 parent e503f82 commit be8e9eb

File tree

5 files changed

+35
-5
lines changed

5 files changed

+35
-5
lines changed

Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst

Lines changed: 17 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -267,6 +267,23 @@ SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW:
267267
two separate messages will be looped to the socket's error queue,
268268
each containing just one timestamp.
269269

270+
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER:
271+
Filter out spurious receive timestamps: report a receive timestamp
272+
only if the matching timestamp generation flag is enabled.
273+
274+
Receive timestamps are generated early in the ingress path, before a
275+
packet's destination socket is known. If any socket enables receive
276+
timestamps, packets for all socket will receive timestamped packets.
277+
Including those that request timestamp reporting with
278+
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE and/or SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE, but
279+
do not request receive timestamp generation. This can happen when
280+
requesting transmit timestamps only.
281+
282+
Receiving spurious timestamps is generally benign. A process can
283+
ignore the unexpected non-zero value. But it makes behavior subtly
284+
dependent on other sockets. This flag isolates the socket for more
285+
deterministic behavior.
286+
270287
New applications are encouraged to pass SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_ID to
271288
disambiguate timestamps and SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TSONLY to operate
272289
regardless of the setting of sysctl net.core.tstamp_allow_data.

include/uapi/linux/net_tstamp.h

Lines changed: 2 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -32,8 +32,9 @@ enum {
3232
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW = (1<<14),
3333
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_BIND_PHC = (1 << 15),
3434
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_ID_TCP = (1 << 16),
35+
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER = (1 << 17),
3536

36-
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_LAST = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_ID_TCP,
37+
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_LAST = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER,
3738
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_MASK = (SOF_TIMESTAMPING_LAST - 1) |
3839
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_LAST
3940
};

net/ethtool/common.c

Lines changed: 1 addition & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -427,6 +427,7 @@ const char sof_timestamping_names[][ETH_GSTRING_LEN] = {
427427
[const_ilog2(SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW)] = "option-tx-swhw",
428428
[const_ilog2(SOF_TIMESTAMPING_BIND_PHC)] = "bind-phc",
429429
[const_ilog2(SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_ID_TCP)] = "option-id-tcp",
430+
[const_ilog2(SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER)] = "option-rx-filter",
430431
};
431432
static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(sof_timestamping_names) == __SOF_TIMESTAMPING_CNT);
432433

net/ipv4/tcp.c

Lines changed: 7 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -2235,6 +2235,7 @@ void tcp_recv_timestamp(struct msghdr *msg, const struct sock *sk,
22352235
struct scm_timestamping_internal *tss)
22362236
{
22372237
int new_tstamp = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TSTAMP_NEW);
2238+
u32 tsflags = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags);
22382239
bool has_timestamping = false;
22392240

22402241
if (tss->ts[0].tv_sec || tss->ts[0].tv_nsec) {
@@ -2274,14 +2275,18 @@ void tcp_recv_timestamp(struct msghdr *msg, const struct sock *sk,
22742275
}
22752276
}
22762277

2277-
if (READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags) & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE)
2278+
if (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE &&
2279+
(tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE ||
2280+
!(tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER)))
22782281
has_timestamping = true;
22792282
else
22802283
tss->ts[0] = (struct timespec64) {0};
22812284
}
22822285

22832286
if (tss->ts[2].tv_sec || tss->ts[2].tv_nsec) {
2284-
if (READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags) & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE)
2287+
if (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE &&
2288+
(tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE ||
2289+
!(tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER)))
22852290
has_timestamping = true;
22862291
else
22872292
tss->ts[2] = (struct timespec64) {0};

net/socket.c

Lines changed: 8 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -946,11 +946,17 @@ void __sock_recv_timestamp(struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *sk,
946946

947947
memset(&tss, 0, sizeof(tss));
948948
tsflags = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags);
949-
if ((tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE) &&
949+
if ((tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE &&
950+
(tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE ||
951+
skb_is_err_queue(skb) ||
952+
!(tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER))) &&
950953
ktime_to_timespec64_cond(skb->tstamp, tss.ts + 0))
951954
empty = 0;
952955
if (shhwtstamps &&
953-
(tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE) &&
956+
(tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE &&
957+
(tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE ||
958+
skb_is_err_queue(skb) ||
959+
!(tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER))) &&
954960
!skb_is_swtx_tstamp(skb, false_tstamp)) {
955961
if_index = 0;
956962
if (skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP_NETDEV)

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)