kunit: allow kunit tests to be loaded as a module

As tests are added to kunit, it will become less feasible to execute
all built tests together.  By supporting modular tests we provide
a simple way to do selective execution on a running system; specifying

CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST=m

...means we can simply "insmod example-test.ko" to run the tests.

To achieve this we need to do the following:

o export the required symbols in kunit
o string-stream tests utilize non-exported symbols so for now we skip
  building them when CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=m.
o drivers/base/power/qos-test.c contains a few unexported interface
  references, namely freq_qos_read_value() and freq_constraints_init().
  Both of these could be potentially defined as static inline functions
  in include/linux/pm_qos.h, but for now we simply avoid supporting
  module build for that test suite.
o support a new way of declaring test suites.  Because a module cannot
  do multiple late_initcall()s, we provide a kunit_test_suites() macro
  to declare multiple suites within the same module at once.
o some test module names would have been too general ("test-test"
  and "example-test" for kunit tests, "inode-test" for ext4 tests);
  rename these as appropriate ("kunit-test", "kunit-example-test"
  and "ext4-inode-test" respectively).

Also define kunit_test_suite() via kunit_test_suites()
as callers in other trees may need the old definition.

Co-developed-by: Knut Omang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Knut Omang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]> # for ext4 bits
Acked-by: David Gow <[email protected]> # For list-test
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>

Author: alan-maguire

drivers/base/power/qos-test.c

@@ -114,4 +114,4 @@ static struct kunit_suite pm_qos_test_module = {
 	.name = "qos-kunit-test",
 	.test_cases = pm_qos_test_cases,
 };
-kunit_test_suite(pm_qos_test_module);
+kunit_test_suites(&pm_qos_test_module);

fs/ext4/Kconfig

@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ config EXT4_DEBUG
 		echo 1 > /sys/module/ext4/parameters/mballoc_debug
 
 config EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS
-	bool "KUnit tests for ext4"
+	tristate "KUnit tests for ext4"
 	select EXT4_FS
 	depends on KUNIT
 	help

fs/ext4/Makefile

@@ -13,5 +13,6 @@ ext4-y	:= balloc.o bitmap.o block_validity.o dir.o ext4_jbd2.o extents.o \
 
 ext4-$(CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL)	+= acl.o
 ext4-$(CONFIG_EXT4_FS_SECURITY)		+= xattr_security.o
-ext4-$(CONFIG_EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS)		+= inode-test.o
+ext4-inode-test-objs			+= inode-test.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS)		+= ext4-inode-test.o
 ext4-$(CONFIG_FS_VERITY)		+= verity.o

fs/ext4/inode-test.c

@@ -269,4 +269,6 @@ static struct kunit_suite ext4_inode_test_suite = {
 	.test_cases = ext4_inode_test_cases,
 };
 
-kunit_test_suite(ext4_inode_test_suite);
+kunit_test_suites(&ext4_inode_test_suite);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");

include/kunit/test.h

@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 #include <kunit/assert.h>
 #include <kunit/try-catch.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/types.h>
 
@@ -197,31 +198,47 @@ void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name);
 int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite);
 
 /**
- * kunit_test_suite() - used to register a &struct kunit_suite with KUnit.
+ * kunit_test_suites() - used to register one or more &struct kunit_suite
+ *			 with KUnit.
  *
- * @suite: a statically allocated &struct kunit_suite.
+ * @suites: a statically allocated list of &struct kunit_suite.
  *
- * Registers @suite with the test framework. See &struct kunit_suite for
+ * Registers @suites with the test framework. See &struct kunit_suite for
  * more information.
  *
- * NOTE: Currently KUnit tests are all run as late_initcalls; this means
+ * When builtin,  KUnit tests are all run as late_initcalls; this means
  * that they cannot test anything where tests must run at a different init
  * phase. One significant restriction resulting from this is that KUnit
  * cannot reliably test anything that is initialize in the late_init phase;
  * another is that KUnit is useless to test things that need to be run in
  * an earlier init phase.
  *
+ * An alternative is to build the tests as a module.  Because modules
+ * do not support multiple late_initcall()s, we need to initialize an
+ * array of suites for a module.
+ *
  * TODO([email protected]): Don't run all KUnit tests as
  * late_initcalls.  I have some future work planned to dispatch all KUnit
  * tests from the same place, and at the very least to do so after
  * everything else is definitely initialized.
  */
-#define kunit_test_suite(suite)						       \
-	static int kunit_suite_init##suite(void)			       \
-	{								       \
-		return kunit_run_tests(&suite);				       \
-	}								       \
-	late_initcall(kunit_suite_init##suite)
+#define kunit_test_suites(...)						\
+	static struct kunit_suite *suites[] = { __VA_ARGS__, NULL};	\
+	static int kunit_test_suites_init(void)				\
+	{								\
+		unsigned int i;						\
+		for (i = 0; suites[i] != NULL; i++)			\
+			kunit_run_tests(suites[i]);			\
+		return 0;						\
+	}								\
+	late_initcall(kunit_test_suites_init);				\
+	static void __exit kunit_test_suites_exit(void)			\
+	{								\
+		return;							\
+	}								\
+	module_exit(kunit_test_suites_exit)
+
+#define kunit_test_suite(suite)	kunit_test_suites(&suite)
 
 /*
  * Like kunit_alloc_resource() below, but returns the struct kunit_resource

kernel/sysctl-test.c

@@ -389,4 +389,6 @@ static struct kunit_suite sysctl_test_suite = {
 	.test_cases = sysctl_test_cases,
 };
 
-kunit_test_suite(sysctl_test_suite);
+kunit_test_suites(&sysctl_test_suite);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");

lib/Kconfig.debug

@@ -2025,7 +2025,7 @@ config TEST_SYSCTL
 	  If unsure, say N.
 
 config SYSCTL_KUNIT_TEST
-	bool "KUnit test for sysctl"
+	tristate "KUnit test for sysctl"
 	depends on KUNIT
 	help
 	  This builds the proc sysctl unit test, which runs on boot.
@@ -2036,7 +2036,7 @@ config SYSCTL_KUNIT_TEST
 	  If unsure, say N.
 
 config LIST_KUNIT_TEST
-	bool "KUnit Test for Kernel Linked-list structures"
+	tristate "KUnit Test for Kernel Linked-list structures"
 	depends on KUNIT
 	help
 	  This builds the linked list KUnit test suite.

lib/kunit/Kconfig

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ menuconfig KUNIT
 if KUNIT
 
 config KUNIT_TEST
-	bool "KUnit test for KUnit"
+	tristate "KUnit test for KUnit"
 	help
 	  Enables the unit tests for the KUnit test framework. These tests test
 	  the KUnit test framework itself; the tests are both written using
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ config KUNIT_TEST
 	  expected.
 
 config KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST
-	bool "Example test for KUnit"
+	tristate "Example test for KUnit"
 	help
 	  Enables an example unit test that illustrates some of the basic
 	  features of KUnit. This test only exists to help new users understand

lib/kunit/Makefile

@@ -3,7 +3,11 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT) +=			test.o \
 					assert.o \
 					try-catch.o
 
-obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) +=		test-test.o \
-					string-stream-test.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) +=		kunit-test.o
 
-obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST) +=	example-test.o
+# string-stream-test compiles built-in only.
+ifeq ($(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST),y)
+obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) +=		string-stream-test.o
+endif
+
+obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST) +=	kunit-example-test.o

lib/kunit/assert.c

@@ -26,20 +26,23 @@ void kunit_base_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
 	string_stream_add(stream, "%s FAILED at %s:%d\n",
 			 expect_or_assert, assert->file, assert->line);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_base_assert_format);
 
 void kunit_assert_print_msg(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
 			    struct string_stream *stream)
 {
 	if (assert->message.fmt)
 		string_stream_add(stream, "\n%pV", &assert->message);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_assert_print_msg);
 
 void kunit_fail_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
 			      struct string_stream *stream)
 {
 	kunit_base_assert_format(assert, stream);
 	string_stream_add(stream, "%pV", &assert->message);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_fail_assert_format);
 
 void kunit_unary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
 			       struct string_stream *stream)
@@ -58,6 +61,7 @@ void kunit_unary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
 				 unary_assert->condition);
 	kunit_assert_print_msg(assert, stream);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_unary_assert_format);
 
 void kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
 				     struct string_stream *stream)
@@ -78,6 +82,7 @@ void kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
 	}
 	kunit_assert_print_msg(assert, stream);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format);
 
 void kunit_binary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
 				struct string_stream *stream)
@@ -99,6 +104,7 @@ void kunit_binary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
 			 binary_assert->right_value);
 	kunit_assert_print_msg(assert, stream);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_binary_assert_format);
 
 void kunit_binary_ptr_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
 				    struct string_stream *stream)
@@ -120,6 +126,7 @@ void kunit_binary_ptr_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
 			 binary_assert->right_value);
 	kunit_assert_print_msg(assert, stream);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_binary_ptr_assert_format);
 
 void kunit_binary_str_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
 				    struct string_stream *stream)
@@ -141,3 +148,4 @@ void kunit_binary_str_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
 			 binary_assert->right_value);
 	kunit_assert_print_msg(assert, stream);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_binary_str_assert_format);