ocxl: Use pci core's DVSEC functionality

Reduce maintenance burden of DVSEC query implementation by using the
centralized PCI core implementation.

There are two obvious places to simply drop in the new core
implementation. There remains find_dvsec_from_pos() which would benefit
from using a core implementation. As that change is less trivial it is
reserved for later.

Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Andrew Donnellan <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Frederic Barrat <[email protected]> (v1)
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163379789065.692348.7117946955275586530.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <[email protected]>

Author: Ben Widawsky

arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/ocxl.c

@@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ static int get_max_afu_index(struct pci_dev *dev, int *afu_idx)
 	int pos;
 	u32 val;
 
-	pos = find_dvsec_from_pos(dev, OCXL_DVSEC_FUNC_ID, 0);
+	pos = pci_find_dvsec_capability(dev, PCI_VENDOR_ID_IBM,
+					OCXL_DVSEC_FUNC_ID);
 	if (!pos)
 		return -ESRCH;
 

drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c

@@ -33,18 +33,7 @@
 
 static int find_dvsec(struct pci_dev *dev, int dvsec_id)
 {
-	int vsec = 0;
-	u16 vendor, id;
-
-	while ((vsec = pci_find_next_ext_capability(dev, vsec,
-						    OCXL_EXT_CAP_ID_DVSEC))) {
-		pci_read_config_word(dev, vsec + OCXL_DVSEC_VENDOR_OFFSET,
-				&vendor);
-		pci_read_config_word(dev, vsec + OCXL_DVSEC_ID_OFFSET, &id);
-		if (vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_IBM && id == dvsec_id)
-			return vsec;
-	}
-	return 0;
+	return pci_find_dvsec_capability(dev, PCI_VENDOR_ID_IBM, dvsec_id);
 }
 
 static int find_dvsec_afu_ctrl(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 afu_idx)