irqchip/gic-v2, v3: Drop extra IRQ_NOAUTOEN setting for (E)PPIs

(E)PPIs are per-CPU interrupts, so we want each CPU to go and enable them
via enable_percpu_irq(); this also means we want IRQ_NOAUTOEN for them as
the autoenable would lead to calling irq_enable() instead of the more
appropriate irq_percpu_enable().

Calling irq_set_percpu_devid() is enough to get just that since it trickles
down to irq_set_percpu_devid_flags(), which gives us IRQ_NOAUTOEN (and a
few others). Setting IRQ_NOAUTOEN *again* right after this call is just
redundant, so don't do it.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

Author: Valentin Schneider

drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c

@@ -1282,7 +1282,6 @@ static int gic_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
 		irq_set_percpu_devid(irq);
 		irq_domain_set_info(d, irq, hw, chip, d->host_data,
 				    handle_percpu_devid_irq, NULL, NULL);
-		irq_set_status_flags(irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
 		break;
 
 	case SPI_RANGE:

drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c

@@ -982,7 +982,6 @@ static int gic_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
 		irq_set_percpu_devid(irq);
 		irq_domain_set_info(d, irq, hw, &gic->chip, d->host_data,
 				    handle_percpu_devid_irq, NULL, NULL);
-		irq_set_status_flags(irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
 	} else {
 		irq_domain_set_info(d, irq, hw, &gic->chip, d->host_data,
 				    handle_fasteoi_irq, NULL, NULL);