iommu/dma: Fix domain init

Despite carefully rewording the kerneldoc to describe the new direct
interaction with dma_range_map, it seems I managed to confuse myself in
removing the redundant force_aperture check and ended up making the code
not do that at all. This led to dma_range_maps inadvertently being able
to set iovad->start_pfn = 0, and all the nonsensical chaos which ensues
from there. Restore the correct behaviour of constraining base_pfn to
the domain aperture regardless of dma_range_map, and not trying to apply
dma_range_map constraints to the basic IOVA domain since they will be
properly handled with reserved regions later.

Reported-by: Jon Hunter <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Jerry Snitselaar <[email protected]>
Fixes: ad4750b ("iommu/dma: Make limit checks self-contained")
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Jerry Snitselaar <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jerry Snitselaar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/721fa6baebb0924aa40db0b8fb86bcb4538434af.1716232484.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <[email protected]>

Author: rmurphy-arm

drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c

@@ -686,15 +686,15 @@ static int iommu_dma_init_domain(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev
 
 	/* Check the domain allows at least some access to the device... */
 	if (map) {
-		dma_addr_t base = dma_range_map_min(map);
-		if (base > domain->geometry.aperture_end ||
+		if (dma_range_map_min(map) > domain->geometry.aperture_end ||
 		    dma_range_map_max(map) < domain->geometry.aperture_start) {
 			pr_warn("specified DMA range outside IOMMU capability\n");
 			return -EFAULT;
 		}
-		/* ...then finally give it a kicking to make sure it fits */
-		base_pfn = max(base, domain->geometry.aperture_start) >> order;
 	}
+	/* ...then finally give it a kicking to make sure it fits */
+	base_pfn = max_t(unsigned long, base_pfn,
+			 domain->geometry.aperture_start >> order);
 
 	/* start_pfn is always nonzero for an already-initialised domain */
 	mutex_lock(&cookie->mutex);