You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
cgroup/cpuset: Fix remote root partition creation problem
Since commit 181c8e0 ("cgroup/cpuset: Introduce remote partition"),
a remote partition can be created underneath a non-partition root cpuset
as long as its exclusive_cpus are set to distribute exclusive CPUs down
to its children. The generate_sched_domains() function, however, doesn't
take into account this new behavior and hence will fail to create the
sched domain needed for a remote root (non-isolated) partition.
There are two issues related to remote partition support. First of
all, generate_sched_domains() has a fast path that is activated if
root_load_balance is true and top_cpuset.nr_subparts is non-zero. The
later condition isn't quite correct for remote partitions as nr_subparts
just shows the number of local child partitions underneath it. There
can be no local child partition under top_cpuset even if there are
remote partitions further down the hierarchy. Fix that by checking
for subpartitions_cpus which contains exclusive CPUs allocated to both
local and remote partitions.
Secondly, the valid partition check for subtree skipping in the csa[]
generation loop isn't enough as remote partition does not need to
have a partition root parent. Fix this problem by breaking csa[] array
generation loop of generate_sched_domains() into v1 and v2 specific parts
and checking a cpuset's exclusive_cpus before skipping its subtree in
the v2 case.
Also simplify generate_sched_domains() for cgroup v2 as only
non-isolating partition roots should be included in building the cpuset
array and none of the v1 scheduling attributes other than a different
way to create an isolated partition are supported.
Fixes: 181c8e0 ("cgroup/cpuset: Introduce remote partition")
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
0 commit comments