You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Simplify the loop in pci_epf_test_set_bar().
If we allocated memory for the BAR, we need to call set_bar() for that
BAR, if we did not allocated memory for that BAR, we need to skip.
It is as simple as that. This also matches the logic in
pci_epf_test_unbind().
A 64-bit BAR will still only be one allocation, with the BAR succeeding
the 64-bit BAR being null.
While at it, remove the misleading comment.
A EPC .set_bar() callback should never change the epf_bar->flags.
(E.g. to set a 64-bit BAR if we requested a 32-bit BAR.)
A .set_bar() callback should do what we request it to do.
If it can't satisfy the request, it should return an error.
If platform has a specific requirement, e.g. that a certain BAR has to
be a 64-bit BAR, then it should specify that by setting the .only_64bit
flag for that specific BAR in epc_features->bar[], such that
pci_epf_alloc_space() will return a epf_bar with the 64-bit flag set.
(Such that .set_bar() will receive a request to set a 64-bit BAR.)
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
0 commit comments