mtd: revert "spi-nor: intel: provide a range for poll_timout"

This change reverts aba3a88: "mtd: spi-nor: intel: provide a range
for poll_timout". That change introduces a performance regression when
reading sequentially from flash. Logging calls to intel_spi_read without
this change we get:

Start MTD read
[   20.045527] intel_spi_read(from=1800000, len=400000)
[   20.045527] intel_spi_read(from=1800000, len=400000)
[  282.199274] intel_spi_read(from=1c00000, len=400000)
[  282.199274] intel_spi_read(from=1c00000, len=400000)
[  544.351528] intel_spi_read(from=2000000, len=400000)
[  544.351528] intel_spi_read(from=2000000, len=400000)
End MTD read

With this change:

Start MTD read
[   21.942922] intel_spi_read(from=1c00000, len=400000)
[   21.942922] intel_spi_read(from=1c00000, len=400000)
[   23.784058] intel_spi_read(from=2000000, len=400000)
[   23.784058] intel_spi_read(from=2000000, len=400000)
[   25.625006] intel_spi_read(from=2400000, len=400000)
[   25.625006] intel_spi_read(from=2400000, len=400000)
End MTD read

Signed-off-by: Luis Alberto Herrera <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Alexander Sverdlin <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <[email protected]>

Author: herrera-luis-alberto

drivers/mtd/spi-nor/controllers/intel-spi.c

@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static int intel_spi_wait_hw_busy(struct intel_spi *ispi)
 	u32 val;
 
 	return readl_poll_timeout(ispi->base + HSFSTS_CTL, val,
-				  !(val & HSFSTS_CTL_SCIP), 40,
+				  !(val & HSFSTS_CTL_SCIP), 0,
 				  INTEL_SPI_TIMEOUT * 1000);
 }
 
@@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ static int intel_spi_wait_sw_busy(struct intel_spi *ispi)
 	u32 val;
 
 	return readl_poll_timeout(ispi->sregs + SSFSTS_CTL, val,
-				  !(val & SSFSTS_CTL_SCIP), 40,
+				  !(val & SSFSTS_CTL_SCIP), 0,
 				  INTEL_SPI_TIMEOUT * 1000);
 }