Skip to content

Commit fa23ad9

Browse files
authored
Merge branch 'master' into single-character_string_constant
2 parents ac9267e + 8ee5644 commit fa23ad9

File tree

1 file changed

+133
-0
lines changed
  • doc/design/008-state-proof-pluggable-parsing

1 file changed

+133
-0
lines changed
Lines changed: 133 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
1+
## Legend
2+
There are some types of requests to Nodes in the Pool allowing to use StateProof optimization in Client-Node communication.
3+
Instead of sending requests to all nodes in the Pool, a client can send a request to a single Node and expect StateProof signed by BLS multi-signature.
4+
5+
BLS multi-signature (BLS MS) guaranties that there was a consensus of Nodes which signed some State identified by State RootHash.
6+
StateProof (SP) is small amount of data which allows to verify particular values against RootHash.
7+
Combination of BLS MS and SP allows clients to be sure about response of single node is a part of State signed by enough Nodes.
8+
9+
## Goals
10+
Libindy allows to extend building of supported requests via plugged interface and send them.
11+
It is nice to have a way to support BLS MS and SP verification for these plugged transactions.
12+
13+
Implementation of math for SP verification is a bit complicate for plugin logic.
14+
Therefore libindy should perform all math calculation inside.
15+
A plugin should provide handler to parse custom reply to fixed data structure.
16+
17+
## API
18+
The signature of the handler is described below together with custom `free` call to deallocate result data.
19+
20+
```rust
21+
extern fn CustomTransactionParser(reply_from_node: *const c_char, parsed_sp: *mut *const c_char) -> ErrorCode;
22+
extern fn CustomFree(data: *mut c_char) -> ErrorCode;
23+
```
24+
25+
Libindy API will contain call to register handler for specific transaction type:
26+
```rust
27+
extern fn indy_register_transaction_parser_for_sp(command_handle: i32,
28+
pool_handle: i32,
29+
txn_type: *const c_char,
30+
parser: CustomTransactionParser,
31+
free: CustomFree,
32+
cb: extern fn(command_handle_: i32, err: ErrorCode)) -> ErrorCode;
33+
```
34+
35+
### Parsed Data structure
36+
37+
A plugin should parse `reply_from_node` and return back to libindy parsed data as JSON string.
38+
Actually this data is array of entities each of them is describe SP Trie and set of key-value pairs to verify against this trie.
39+
It can be represented as `Vec<ParsedSP>` serialized to JSON.
40+
41+
42+
```rust
43+
/**
44+
Single item to verification:
45+
- SP Trie with RootHash
46+
- BLS MS
47+
- set of key-value to verify
48+
*/
49+
struct ParsedSP {
50+
/// encoded SP Trie transferred from Node to Client
51+
proof_nodes: String,
52+
/// RootHash of the Trie, start point for verification. Should be same with appropriate filed in BLS MS data
53+
root_hash: String,
54+
/// entities to verification against current SP Trie
55+
kvs_to_verify: KeyValuesInSP,
56+
/// BLS MS data for verification
57+
multi_signature: serde_json::Value,
58+
}
59+
60+
/**
61+
Variants of representation for items to verify against SP Trie
62+
Right now 2 options are specified:
63+
- simple array of key-value pair
64+
- whole subtrie
65+
*/
66+
enum KeyValuesInSP {
67+
Simple(KeyValueSimpleData),
68+
SubTrie(KeyValuesSubTrieData),
69+
}
70+
71+
/**
72+
Simple variant of `KeyValuesInSP`.
73+
74+
All required data already present in parent SP Trie (built from `proof_nodes`).
75+
`kvs` can be verified directly in parent trie
76+
*/
77+
struct KeyValueSimpleData {
78+
kvs: Vec<(String /* b64-encoded key */, Option<String /* val */>)>
79+
}
80+
81+
/**
82+
Subtrie variant of `KeyValuesInSP`.
83+
84+
In this case Client (libindy) should construct subtrie and append it into trie based on `proof_nodes`.
85+
After this preparation each kv pair can be checked.
86+
*/
87+
struct KeyValuesSubTrieData {
88+
/// base64-encoded common prefix of each pair in `kvs`. Should be used to correct merging initial trie and subtrie
89+
sub_trie_prefix: Option<String>,
90+
kvs: Vec<(String /* b64-encoded key_suffix */, Option<String /* val */>)>,
91+
}
92+
```
93+
94+
Expected libindy and plugin workflow is the following:
95+
1. Libindy receive reply from a Node, perform initial processing and pass raw reply to plugin.
96+
1. Plugin parse reply from the Node and specify one or more SP Trie with metadata and items for verification.
97+
1. Each SP Trie described by plugin as `ParsedSP`:
98+
1. Set of encoded nodes of the SP Trie, received from Node - `proof_nodes`. May be fetched from response "as is".
99+
1. RootHash of this Trie. May be fetched from the response "as is" also.
100+
1. BLS MS data. Again may be fetched from the response "as is".
101+
1. Key-value items to verification. Here plugin should define correct keys (path in the trie) and corresponded values.
102+
1. Plugin return serialized as JSON array of `ParsedSP`
103+
1. For each `ParsedSP` libindy:
104+
1. build base trie from `proof_nodes`
105+
1. if items to verify is `SubTrie`, construct this subtrie from (key-suffix, value) pairs and merge it with trie from clause above
106+
1. iterate other key-value pairs and verify that trie (with signed `root_hash`) contains `value` at specified `key`
107+
1. verify multi-signature
108+
1. If any verification is failed, libindy ignore particular SP + BLS MS and try to request same data from another node,
109+
or collect consensus of same replies from enough count of Nodes.
110+
111+
112+
Below is JSON structure for `Simple` case.
113+
```json
114+
[
115+
{
116+
"proof_nodes": "string with serialized SP tree",
117+
"root_hash": "string with root hash",
118+
"kvs_to_verify": {
119+
"type": "simple",
120+
"kvs": [["key1", "value1"], ["key2", "value2"]]
121+
},
122+
"multi_signature": "JSON object from Node`s reply as is"
123+
}
124+
]
125+
```
126+
127+
### Simple and SubTrie verification
128+
129+
Some use cases require verification multiply pairs of key-value in one Trie.
130+
Moreover there is possible situation when client would like to verify whole subtrie.
131+
In this case, the amount of data transferred from Node to Client can be significantly reduced.
132+
Instead of including all nodes for SP verification to `proof_nodes`, Node can include only prefix path down to subtrie.
133+
The entire subtrie to verification can be restored on Client side from key-value pairs and combined with prefix part.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)