@@ -476,48 +476,48 @@ \section{Solver Presentation}
476476\end {frame }
477477}
478478
479- % \myincludepdf{slides-bitwuzla.pdf}
480-
479+ \myincludepdf {solver/Bitwuzla.pdf}
481480% \myincludepdf{slides-colibri.pdf}
482481
483- % %\myincludepdf{slides-cvc5.pdf}
484-
485- % \myvideopdf{cvc5-NRA-LS}{slides-cvc5-nra-ls.mp4}
486-
487- % \myvideopdf{iProver}{slides-iProver.mp4}
488-
489- % \myvideopdf{ismt, Yices-ismt}{slides-ismt.mp4}
490-
491- % \myincludepdf{slides-ismt-ppt.pdf}
492-
493- % \myincludepdf{slides-opensmt.pdf}
482+ \begin {frame }
483+ \frametitle {COLIBRI}
494484
495- % \myvideopdf{Ostrich}{slides-Ostrich.mkv}
485+ \begin {itemize }
486+ \item CP/SMT solver, propagation, no learning
487+ \item QF\_ FParith: propagation at the floating point or bitvector level (no bot-blsting)
488+ \item 2025: More propagations for transcendental functions (Could we create a category for them?)
489+ \end {itemize }
490+ \vfill
491+ \includegraphics [height=1cm]{logo_cea.png}
492+ \end {frame }
496493
497- % \myincludepdf{slides-smtinterpol.pdf}
498494
499- % \myincludepdf{slides-smtrat.pdf}
500495
501- % \myvideopdf{UltimateEliminator+MathSAT}{slides-UltimateEliminator.mkv}
496+ \begin {frame }
497+ \frametitle {colibri2}
502498
503- % \myincludepdf{slides-vampire.pdf}
499+ \begin {itemize }
500+ \item First year participation
501+ \item CP/SMT solver, propagation, no learning
502+ \item Uses Dolmen as parser, so parse all standardized SMT-LIB theories
503+ \item For 2025: participation only in QF\_ FParith, many propagators from COLIBRI but nearly no propagators for BV
504+ \item For 2026: add BV propagators ;), participation in quantified theory?
505+ \end {itemize }
506+ \vfill
507+ \includegraphics [height=1cm]{logo_cea.png}
508+ \end {frame }
504509
505- % \myincludepdf{slides-yaga .pdf}
510+ \myincludepdf {solver/cvc5 .pdf}
506511
507- % \myincludepdf{slides-Yices-2023 .pdf}
512+ \myincludepdf {solver/opensmt .pdf}
508513
509- % \myincludepdf{slides-YicesQS -2025.pdf}
514+ \myincludepdf {solver/ostrich-smt-comp -2025.pdf}
510515
511- % \myvideopdf{Z3-Z3++}{slides-z3-z3++.mp4}
512- \begin {frame }
513- \textcolor {red}{TODO: Add solver slides received through the call}
514- %
515- % \frametitle{Z3-Z3++}
516+ \myincludepdf {solver/smtinterpol.pdf}
516517
517- % \begin{center}
518- % \url{https://youtu.be/fBB0Wxxf9vA}
519- % \end{center}
520- \end {frame }
518+ % \begin{frame}
519+ % \textcolor{red}{TODO: Add solver slides received through the call}
520+ % \end{frame}
521521
522522\begin {frame }
523523 \frametitle {Other participants}
@@ -903,15 +903,38 @@ \section{Solver Presentation}
903903 \end {itemize }
904904\end {frame }
905905
906+ % http://localhost:1313/2025/results/qf_fparith-single-query-chart/
907+ % http://localhost:1313/2025/results/lia-single-query-chart/
908+ % http://localhost:1313/2025/results/qf_bitvec-single-query/
909+ % http://localhost:1313/2025/results/qf_strings-single-query/
910+
911+
912+ \begin {frame }{Derived Solver: like any solver?}
906913
907- \begin {frame }{Derived Solver}
908-
909914 Derived Tool: A derived tool is defined as any solver that is based on and \textbf {extends another SMT
910915solver } (the base solver) \textbf {from a different group of authors }. In contrast to a wrapper tool, a derived
911916tool solving a benchmark of \textbf {logic A } is allowed to call an SMT solver to solve a problem for \textbf {logic
912917A }.
913918\end {frame }
914919
920+ \begin {frame }
921+ \frametitle {Derived Solver: like any solver?}
922+ \begin {itemize }
923+ \item Some derived solver are very different from the base solver
924+ \item Some derived solver had only a small increment
925+ \end {itemize }
926+ \end {frame }
927+
928+ \begin {frame }
929+ \frametitle {Derived Solver: like any solver?}
930+ \begin {itemize }[<+->]
931+ \item The comparison with the base solver should help see the improvement
932+ \item "Best Family of solver" ? Give credit to the base solver
933+ \item Different podium? but we have derived of derived solver
934+ \item What means different enough?
935+ \end {itemize }
936+ \end {frame }
937+
915938% \begin{frame}{SMT-COMP organizing committee}
916939 % Three people organize the SMT-COMP. In 2026:
917940 % \begin{itemize}
0 commit comments