You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
sol = solve(sprob, STrapezoid(); seed = 12345) # hide
214
217
plot(sol)
215
218
```
@@ -317,9 +320,9 @@ plot(sol)
317
320
### [Designating aggregators and simulation methods for jump simulations](@id simulation_intro_jumps_solver_designation)
318
321
Jump simulations (just like ODEs and SDEs) are performed using solver methods. Unlike ODEs and SDEs, jump simulations are carried out by two different types of methods acting in tandem. First, an *aggregator* method is used to (after each reaction) determine the time to, and type of, the next reaction. Next, a simulation method is used to actually carry out the simulation.
319
322
320
-
Several different aggregators are available (a full list is provided [here](https://docs.sciml.ai/JumpProcesses/stable/jump_types/#Jump-Aggregators-for-Exact-Simulation)). To designate a specific one, provide it as the third argument to the `JumpProblem`. E.g. to designate that Gillespie's direct method (`Direct`) should be used, use:
323
+
Several different aggregators are available (a full list is provided [here](https://docs.sciml.ai/JumpProcesses/stable/jump_types/#Jump-Aggregators-for-Exact-Simulation)). To designate a specific one, provide it as the third argument to the `JumpProblem`. E.g. to designate that the sorting direct method (`SortingDirect`) should be used, use:
Especially for large systems, the choice of aggregator is relevant to simulation performance. A guide for aggregator selection is provided [here](@ref ref).
0 commit comments