You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/src/inverse_problems/structural_identifiability.md
+2-2Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Identifiability can be divided into *structural* and *practical* identifiability
5
5
6
6
Structural identifiability (which is what this tutorial considers) can be illustrated by the following differential equation:
7
7
${dx \over dt} = p1*p2*x(t)$
8
-
where, however much data is collected on *x*, it is impossible to determine the distinct values of *p1* and *p2*. Hence, these parameters are these are non-identifiable.
8
+
where, however much data is collected on $x$, it is impossible to determine the distinct values of $p1$ and $p2$. Hence, these parameters are these are non-identifiable (however, their product, $p1*p2$, *is* identifiable).
9
9
10
10
Catalyst contains a special extension for carrying out structural identifiability analysis using the [StructuralIdentifiability.jl](https://github.com/SciML/StructuralIdentifiability.jl) package. This enables StructuralIdentifiability's `assess_identifiability`, `assess_local_identifiability`, and `find_identifiable_functions` functions to be called directly on Catalyst `ReactionSystem`s. It also implements specialised routines to make these more efficient when applied to reaction network models. How to use these functions is described in the following tutorial, with [StructuralIdentifiability providing a more extensive documentation](https://docs.sciml.ai/StructuralIdentifiability/stable/). If you use this in your research, please [cite the StructuralIdentifiability.jl](@ref structural_identifiability_citation) and [Catalyst.jl](@ref catalyst_citation) publications.
11
11
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ Not only does this turn the previously non-identifiable `pₑ` (globally) identi
57
57
To, in a similar manner, indicate that certain initial conditions are known is a work in progress. Hopefully the feature should be an available in the near future.
58
58
59
59
### Providing non-trivial measured quantities
60
-
Sometimes, we are not actually measuring species species, but rather some combinations of species (or possibly parameters). Here, any algebraic expression can be used in `measured_quantities`. If so, used species and parameters have to first be `@unpack`'ed from the model. Say that we have a model where an enzyme ($E$) is converted between an active and inactive form, which in turns activates the production of a product, $P$:
60
+
Sometimes, we are not actually measuring species species, but rather some combinations of species (or possibly parameters). Here, any algebraic expression can be used in `measured_quantities`. Species and parameters have to first be `@unpack`'ed from the model to be used in such expressions. Say that we have a model where an enzyme ($E$) is converted between an active and inactive form, which in turns activates the production of a product, $P$:
0 commit comments