BibTex (citation) for LinearSolve.jl

[ytdHuang]

Hi,
I am currently writing an article and also going to publish a new package.
This package (and also DifferentialEquations.jl) really helps me a lot on my research topic, and I would like to cite these packages.

I did see DifferentialEquations.jl provides the bibtex in github, but not for LinearSolve.jl.

Does the package owner agree with the following citations?

@software{LinearSolve.jl,
  author = {SciML},
  title = {LinearSolve.jl},
  url = {https://github.com/SciML/LinearSolve.jl}
}

I just want to make sure and hope to cite in the way the package owner and the developers want.

[ChrisRackauckas]

@Wimmerer and @vpuri3 deserve to be in there. Let's say it's:

@software{LinearSolve.jl,
  author = {Will Kimmerer, Vedant Puri, Chris Rackauckas},
  title = {LinearSolve.jl},
  url = {https://github.com/SciML/LinearSolve.jl}
}

We should do a JOSS paper soon.

[rayegun]

What's the policy on citing individual solvers. I guess once we have a paper out we can cite those there and that's sufficient.

[ChrisRackauckas]

We should put the references for each solver in the solver's docstring, and have a solver API page with the docstrings.

[rayegun]

I'll do at least the sparse docs later this week. The dense ones should be mostly easy to find.

[ytdHuang]

I just finished the development of my package, and started to prepare the manuscript for publication.
Temporally, I will use the bibTex @ChrisRackauckas given above.
Since, from @Wimmerer's comment, it seems that there is also a paper for LinearSolve.jl in the future ?
Let me know if there is any update for the citation of LinearSolve.jl.

[briochemc]

We should do a JOSS paper soon.

Is there a JOSS paper? Or any update on how to cite LinearSolve.jl?

[ChrisRackauckas]

It hopefully should be done by the end of the month.

[briochemc]

Here is a gentle reminder in case this has fallen through the cracks.

[rayegun]

Hasn't fallen through, just fallen behind. I will do my best to get a preprint up early next week.

…

On Sun, Feb 2, 2025 at 8:45 PM Benoît Pasquier ***@***.***> wrote: Here is a gentle reminder in case this has fallen through the cracks. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#211 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACG6QVZ6UWZLFQM3SPKDOST2N3C2LAVCNFSM6AAAAABUUTSY66VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMMRZG4YTGNZXGM> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[ytdHuang]

Another gentle reminder (cause I'm writing another paper again).

[ChrisRackauckas]

It's not done yet. It's being turned into a much larger review of linear solvers with benchmarks, making it into a more comprehensive paper.

[ytdHuang]

I’m rooting for you guys !

I will probably leave this issue open.