Skip to content

Conversation

@avik-pal
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@avik-pal avik-pal force-pushed the ap/fix_tests_simplenonlinearsolve branch from 8f3bb7d to c297909 Compare April 19, 2025 01:38
Base automatically changed from ap/fix_565 to master April 19, 2025 01:38
@avik-pal avik-pal force-pushed the ap/fix_tests_simplenonlinearsolve branch from c297909 to 2142c79 Compare April 19, 2025 01:39
@avik-pal avik-pal marked this pull request as ready for review April 19, 2025 02:26
@avik-pal
Copy link
Member Author

https://github.com/SciML/NonlinearSolve.jl/actions/runs/14544669588/job/40808434530?pr=580 is the only failing one atm and I am not sure why

@avik-pal avik-pal merged commit 21e028b into master Apr 19, 2025
84 of 86 checks passed
@avik-pal avik-pal deleted the ap/fix_tests_simplenonlinearsolve branch April 19, 2025 06:29
prob, SimpleBroyden(; alg.linesearch), args...;
abstol, reltol, maxiters, termination_condition, kwargs...
)
return Utils.nonlinear_solution_new_alg(sol, alg)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

won't this lead to type stability issues?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no this will fix it. we need to use simplebroyden for the solve process. But we ensure all branches mark the returned alg as simplelbroyden

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants