You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This PR adds the SIMD Runge-Kutta methods (MER5v2, MER6v2, RK6v4) from OrdinaryDiffEqSIMDRK
to the existing non-stiff ODE benchmarks for performance comparison.
- Updated FitzhughNagumo_wpd.jmd with SIMD methods
- Updated LotkaVolterra_wpd.jmd with SIMD methods
- Updated RigidBody_wpd.jmd with SIMD methods
- Updated linear_wpd.jmd with SIMD methods
- Added OrdinaryDiffEqSIMDRK to Project.toml dependencies
These methods use SIMD instructions for improved performance on compatible hardware.
Based on SciML/SIMDRungeKutta.jl#16
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: benchmarks/NonStiffODE/LotkaVolterra_wpd.jmd
+6-3Lines changed: 6 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ author: Chris Rackauckas
8
8
The purpose of this problem is to test the performance on easy problems. Since it's periodic, the error is naturally low, and so most of the difference will come down to startup times and, when measuring the interpolations, the algorithm choices.
9
9
10
10
```julia
11
-
using OrdinaryDiffEq, ParameterizedFunctions, ODEInterfaceDiffEq, LSODA,
12
-
Sundials, DiffEqDevTools, StaticArrays
11
+
using OrdinaryDiffEq, OrdinaryDiffEqCore, ParameterizedFunctions, ODEInterfaceDiffEq, LSODA,
0 commit comments