You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When rechunking a cube, but we always want to rechunk the data. This makes the need to call data superfluous. It also requires an extra step in Iris understanding that would make it more approachable if removed.
But we are also not keep to remove it from cube.data as that would require changes to existing workflows and possibly confuse people that understood the previous behaviour.
Taking that into account, and in an effort to dodge future problems, we think that a thin wrapper around the existing behaviour so that both versions exist without the need for duplicated code.
This is certainly not set in stone and so we welcome thoughts and or suggestions about this.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
When rechunking a cube, but we always want to rechunk the data. This makes the need to call data superfluous. It also requires an extra step in Iris understanding that would make it more approachable if removed.
But we are also not keep to remove it from
cube.data
as that would require changes to existing workflows and possibly confuse people that understood the previous behaviour.Taking that into account, and in an effort to dodge future problems, we think that a thin wrapper around the existing behaviour so that both versions exist without the need for duplicated code.
This is certainly not set in stone and so we welcome thoughts and or suggestions about this.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions