SO 2.3.40: Proxy coverage #3789
-
I experimented with installing SO 2.3.40 this week with proxy settings enabled. The goal was to see if enabling a proxy would negate the need for a standalone sensor to connect to hosts on the internet directly. My findings indicate that even with a proxy enabled, there is still a significant amount of traffic that bypasses the proxy. Is this intentional / expected? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 3 comments 5 replies
-
I should mention, the proxy configuration was done via so-setup, not via the instructions at [https://docs.securityonion.net/en/2.3/proxy.html?highlight=proxy]. The manual proxy instructions don't match what the set_proxy() function actually does. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
What traffic are you expecting to move through the proxy? There is no way to set a global proxy on Linux, so apps/components typically need to be configured separately to route their traffic through a proxy. We try to streamline this process during setup by doing the following:
If there's traffic you expect should be going through the proxy and isn't currently, let us know and we'll look into it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
We are looking into the telemetry and options to disable it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
#3838
We are looking into the telemetry and options to disable it.