Replies: 1 comment
-
These kinds of issues can happen with the vulnerability scanning in Wazuh and that's why we don't enable that feature by default. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello,
after setting up Wazuh vulnerability scanning, I am getting lots of False Positives.
I am scanning Ubuntu Servers but get lots of alerts for CVEs affecting other distros like Debian or Fedora. This happens at a scale making it barely useful. But i think it should be able to work correctly, so I am wondering I missing something in the setup.
This is my setup:
Alerts coming in for e.g. CVE-2021-3973 which is a heap overflow in vim. The affected version is <8.2.3611 in this feed:
But Ubuntu fixed this in earlier versions with respect to their own versioning. The Canoncial CVE DB also reflects this and does not match.
So, this should not match. But it does and produces an alert as well as other CVEs.
In case of a single False Positive I would not bother and just put it in a list to be ignored. This is easy enough with Wazuh. But I have lots of such cases and therefore expect more in the future with new CVEs. I need a general solution and think this is built already into Wazuh and just does not work in my setup.
I would appreciate any thoughts regarding possible solutions to this.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions