Cant get SO to respond to TCP health checks from LB #9997
Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
-
The monitoring interface is in promiscuous mode -- it doesn't have an IP address, so there's no way to run a service check against it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have been able to add a static IP on the Monitor interface and I was able to get my NLB Health check to pass and still add Promiscuous to the interface. When I run 'sudo tcpdump -i ens5 -s 1500 -vv port not 22' I see the traffic I am looking for in my console but does that mean SO is ingesting it? Also when looking at ifconfig I see a lot of packets RX for ens5 but 0 for bond0, should bond0 be matching the Monitoring interface? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello,
I am trying to standup a stand alone SO in an environment that requires network VTAPs send traffic to a Load Balancer and the LB requires the backends to pass a Health Check before sending the traffic. I have tried to configure the Health Check to be TCP/22 but the SO still will not respond on it "Monitoring" interface, Health Check will work for a generic CentOS system. I dont understand this since I set the SO to respond to SSH on this interface and I have tested ssh into the SO from this vNIC. So does anyone know how I could either add HTTP/HTTPS to respond to the Monitoring interface and not just the Management interface or items to check to find out why the TCP/22 service doesnt answer the LB.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions