ArrayList vs LinkedList in Java

Signed-off-by: https://github.com/Someshdiwan <[email protected]>

Author: Someshdiwan

Section 25 Collections Frameworks/List Interface/ArrayList/src/Files/ArrayList vs LinkedList in Java 1.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+ArrayList vs LinkedList in Java:
+
+## 1. Core Idea
+
+- Both `ArrayList` and `LinkedList` are implementations of the `List` interface.
+- They differ in **internal data structures** and **performance characteristics**.
+- Choosing between them depends on your use case: random access vs frequent insertions/deletions.
+
+---
+
+## 2. Internal Working
+
+**ArrayList**
+- Backed by a **dynamic array** (resizable).
+- Elements are stored **contiguously in memory**.
+- Access by index is **O(1)**.
+- Insertions/removals in the middle require **shifting elements** → **O(n)**.
+
+**LinkedList**
+- Backed by a **doubly linked list**.
+- Each node stores data + references to `next` and `prev`.
+- Access by index is **O(n)** (traversal needed).
+- Insertions/removals (once position is found) are **O(1)**, since only links are updated.
+
+---
+
+## 3. Performance Comparison
+
+| Operation                 | ArrayList                   | LinkedList                          |
+|---------------------------|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------|
+| Access by Index           | O(1) → Fast                | O(n) → Slow (traverse list)         |
+| Insert/Delete at End       | Amortized O(1)             | O(1)                                |
+| Insert/Delete in Middle    | O(n) (shift elements)      | O(1) (if node is known)             |
+| Memory Usage               | More efficient (contiguous)| Higher (extra pointers per node)    |
+| Iteration                  | Very fast                  | Fast, but slightly more overhead    |
+
+---
+
+## 4. Memory Considerations
+
+- **ArrayList**: Efficient in memory usage, since it stores elements in a single contiguous block.
+- **LinkedList**: Consumes more memory because each node stores:
+  - The element itself.
+  - A reference to the previous node.
+  - A reference to the next node.
+
+---
+
+## 5. Best Use Cases
+
+**ArrayList**
+- Frequent **random access** by index.
+- Iteration-heavy tasks (traversing all elements).
+- Adding/removing mainly at the **end**.
+- Example: Displaying a product catalog on a webpage where items are fetched by position.
+
+**LinkedList**
+- Frequent **insertions/deletions in the middle**.
+- Implementation of **stacks, queues, or deques**.
+- Undo/Redo operations (history management).
+- Example: Storing edit history in a text editor.
+
+---
+
+## 6. Practical Scenario: Music Player Playlist
+
+- **ArrayList** is preferred:
+  - Fast random access (`play 5th song` → O(1)).
+  - Efficient sequential iteration (playing songs in order).
+  - Efficient adding/removing at the end (adding new songs).
+- While reordering (middle insertions/deletions) may occur, it’s less frequent and the performance trade-off is
+negligible compared to the benefits.
+
+---
+
+## 7. Quick Recap
+
+- Use **ArrayList** → When you need **fast random access** and mostly add/remove at the end.
+- Use **LinkedList** → When you need **fast insertions/removals in the middle** and don’t care about random access performance.
+- Both implement `List`, but the **choice depends on workload pattern**.