Replies: 1 comment
-
Not specifically, except to have the distributions explicit in each framework. You are free to suggest a different way. Thanks. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
First of all thank you for working on several boosting LSS versions (xgboost, catboost, lightgbm)!
I did notice that both xgb and lightgbm have the (at first sight) exact same
distributions.pysubmodule that is thetorchcore of for any distribution supported as a boosting prediction:Is there a specific reason to not share the distribution modules (and any other shared functionality, like plotting of distribution results) in a common Python module that then gets imported/shared as a common dependency here to avoid duplication; and separate development from adding distributions vs adding functionality to the boosting part of the modules.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions