Improvements in new Sky Culture : Indian (Nakshatras)

[Fourth-Cosmic-Velocity]

@sushoff
It's great to have a new sky culture associated with Nakshatras in the Stellarium v25.4.
I could understand from the sky culture description that, all the sky culture art used for this sky culture are from the temple engravements. I have analyzed the sky culture and have three recommendations.

1. The Abhijit nakshatra art used is not the exact symbol of Abhijit. The exact symbol is shown here. (I am happy to help you by designing the exact art for Abhijit)

2. All art figures have a rectangular enclosure; I believe those are just the boundary of those drawings as shown here, not the part of the drawing.
3. The figures are of different magnifications, for example, Ardra and Svati are single stars, but the art dimensions are very much different.

Please take a look at these.

[sushoff]

ad 2. yes, I intentionally copied the frame of the squares to show the different sizes on the sky (of same sizes in the engraving). the original copy (prior to mapping) is given in the All Skies Encyclopaedia https://ase.exopla.net/index.php/Indian_Names_(All_Terms)#/media/File:Nakshatras_in_Temple_draw+lbl_4ase.jpg

ad 3. yes, different sizes are intentional but random

ad 1. oh, this one is my biggest threat here - on the photograph that I was given, it was almost invisible and I actually thought about just displaying an empty square: if you can provide me with a better drawing of this Abhijit, I will be happy to replace mine!

[Fourth-Cosmic-Velocity]

@sushoff,
Thanks for the response,
ad 2. Those drawings are on the lintel on the door of the temple. So to fill that rectangular section of the lintel, they have divided the area of the lintel into 28 squares, and put each lunar stations figure there. So, it looks like, it's a rectangular boundary for aesthetics, not the astronomical boundary.
ad 1. As per my conclusion in the above statement, I think, for single stars, the magnification shall be same
ad 3. Understood. Unlike the other 27 lunar stations, which drawn as flowers; they have used the exact word in Tamil (the oldest language in the world) for this lunar station. I have attached the image designed based on the exact aspect ratio as per the engraving below.

[sushoff]

THANK YOU very much for the 28th drawing!!! I will replace it.
(PS: I suspected, it would be a word - but I couldn't recognise anything and obviously some stone structure also misled me to "see" a face-like structure: that only proves that I am human ;-) also good to know; sometimes I forget)

ad 2. I agree, that's what I also understood - do you think, anybody could interpret it as astronomical boundaries??? I would never think like this... I just wanted to indicate the different scale of the drawings in the sky. (but, oh!, who knows what other people think ...)
ad 1. hm ... I don't see a reason for the same size - in particular with regard to the above proof that the engravings are not to any scale

[Fourth-Cosmic-Velocity]

@sushoff,
Thanks for the reply,

1. 😅, Right I also could see some face in that figure. No issues, that's normal. BTW, kindly hold on on replacing the image, there is one more update pending. But anyways the picture dimensions shall be same as before.
2. Fine, no problem
3. I meant that since the drawing boundaries are for aesthetics only, you can simply put the image without magnification, fine no problem.

[Fourth-Cosmic-Velocity]

@sushoff,
Please find the attached image for Abhijith. Please note that image is in the upright position.