Skip to content

Commit af7a027

Browse files
committed
docs: Update crate versions
1 parent d872f54 commit af7a027

File tree

3 files changed

+4
-4
lines changed

3 files changed

+4
-4
lines changed

README.md

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ To include it in your project, add the following line to the dependencies sectio
5353

5454
```toml
5555
[dependencies]
56-
css-inline = "0.11"
56+
css-inline = "0.12"
5757
```
5858

5959
The Minimum Supported Rust Version is 1.65.
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ fn main() -> Result<(), css_inline::InlineError> {
146146

147147
`css-inline` typically inlines HTML emails within hundreds of microseconds, though results may vary with input complexity.
148148

149-
Benchmarks for `css-inline==0.11.2`:
149+
Benchmarks for `css-inline==0.12.0`:
150150

151151
- Basic: **6.51 µs**, 230 bytes
152152
- Realistic-1: **137.91 µs**, 8.58 KB

bindings/python/README.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ Most of the time it achieves over a **10x** speed advantage compared to the next
174174

175175
Here is the performance comparison:
176176

177-
| | Size | `css_inline 0.11.2` | `premailer 3.10.0` | `toronado 0.1.0` | `inlinestyler 0.2.5` | `pynliner 0.8.0` |
177+
| | Size | `css_inline 0.12.0` | `premailer 3.10.0` | `toronado 0.1.0` | `inlinestyler 0.2.5` | `pynliner 0.8.0` |
178178
|-------------|---------|---------------------|------------------------|------------------------|------------------------|------------------------|
179179
| Basic | 230 B | 6.75 µs | 131.50 µs (**19.48x**) | 666.20 µs (**98.70x**) | 1.05 ms (**155.82x**) | 1.20 ms (**178.63x**) |
180180
| Realistic-1 | 8.58 KB | 138.79 µs | 1.43 ms (**10.34x**) | 16.52 ms (**119.07x**) | 27.59 ms (**198.85x**) | 51.74 ms (**372.84x**) |

bindings/ruby/README.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ It consistently outperforms `premailer`, offering speed increases often exceedin
141141

142142
The table below provides a detailed comparison between `css_inline` and `premailer` when inlining CSS into an HTML document (like in the Usage section above):
143143

144-
| | Size | `css_inline 0.11.2` | `premailer 1.21.0 with Nokogiri 1.15.2` | Difference |
144+
| | Size | `css_inline 0.12.0` | `premailer 1.21.0 with Nokogiri 1.15.2` | Difference |
145145
|-------------------|---------|---------------------|------------------------------------------------|------------|
146146
| Basic usage | 230 B | 8.27 µs | 433.55 µs | **52.35x** |
147147
| Realistic email 1 | 8.58 KB | 159.20 µs | 9.88 ms | **62.10x** |

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)