docs: Update benchmarks

Author: Stranger6667

bindings/python/README.md

@@ -175,30 +175,30 @@ library has excellent performance characteristics. In comparison with other Pyth
 
 For inlining CSS in the html document from the `Usage` section above there is the following breakdown in the benchmarks:
 
-- `css_inline 0.9.0` - 10.92 us
-- `premailer 3.10.0` - 300.28 us (**x27.49**)
-- `toronado 0.1.0` - 1.47 ms (**x135.27**)
-- `inlinestyler 0.2.5` - 2.13 ms (**x195.24**)
-- `pynliner 0.8.0` - 2.40 ms (**x220.51**)
+- `css_inline 0.9.0` - 9.95 us
+- `premailer 3.10.0` - 210.27 us (**x21.11**)
+- `toronado 0.1.0` - 1.10 ms (**x110.96**)
+- `inlinestyler 0.2.5` - 1.72 ms (**x172.92**)
+- `pynliner 0.8.0` - 1.95 ms (**x195.90**)
 
 Realistic email 1:
 
-- `css_inline 0.9.0` - 244.05 us
-- `premailer 3.10.0` - 2.80 ms (**x11.51**)
-- `toronado 0.1.0` - 31.24 ms (**x128.03**)
-- `inlinestyler 0.2.5` - 54.01 ms (**x221.33**)
-- `pynliner 0.8.0` - 89.71 ms (**x367.62**)
+- `css_inline 0.9.0` - 277.01 us
+- `premailer 3.10.0` - 2.68 ms (**x9.69**)
+- `toronado 0.1.0` - 27.03 ms (**x97.59**)
+- `inlinestyler 0.2.5` - 51.74 ms (**x186.81**)
+- `pynliner 0.8.0` - 86.89 ms (**x313.67**)
 
 Realistic email 2:
 
-- `css_inline 0.9.0` - 187.51 us
-- `premailer 3.10.0` - 4.32 ms (**x23.06**)
+- `css_inline 0.9.0` - 155.67 us
+- `premailer 3.10.0` - 4.05 ms (**x26.04**)
 - `toronado 0.1.0` - `Error: Pseudo-elements are not supported`
-- `inlinestyler 0.2.5` - 35.55 ms (**x189.60**)
+- `inlinestyler 0.2.5` - 29.51 ms (**x189.58**)
 - `pynliner 0.8.0` - `Error: No match was found`
 
 You can take a look at the benchmarks' code at `benches/bench.py` file.
-The results above were measured with stable `rustc 1.70.0`, `Python 3.11.0` on `Linux x86_64`.
+The results above were measured with stable `rustc 1.70.0` on `Python 3.11.0`.
 
 ## Comparison with other libraries