Update blog-service/2024-11-07-search.md

JV0812 · jpipkin1 · web-flow · commit a07c332d2bdc · 2024-11-07T12:17:13.000+05:30
Co-authored-by: John Pipkin (Sumo Logic) &lt;jpipkin@sumologic.com&gt;
diff --git a/blog-service/2024-11-07-search.md b/blog-service/2024-11-07-search.md
@@ -12,4 +12,4 @@ import useBaseUrl from '@docusaurus/useBaseUrl';
 
 <a href="https://help.sumologic.com/release-notes-service/rss.xml"><img src={useBaseUrl('img/release-notes/rss-orange2.png')} alt="icon" width="50"/></a>
 
-We're happy to announce a change in the computation for the `scanned_partition_count` search audit index field. Previously, we were using incorrect computation to  calculate the value for the `scanned_partition_count` field. With this change, the incorrect computation is fixed and now you will obtain the correct number of partitions scanned for the respective search.
+We're happy to announce a change in the computation for the `scanned_partition_count` Search Audit Index field. Previously, we were using incorrect computation to  calculate the value for the `scanned_partition_count` field. With this change, the incorrect computation is fixed and now you will obtain the correct number of partitions scanned for the respective search.

Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -12,4 +12,4 @@ import useBaseUrl from '@docusaurus/useBaseUrl';`
`12`	`12`
`13`	`13`	`<a href="https://help.sumologic.com/release-notes-service/rss.xml"><img src={useBaseUrl('img/release-notes/rss-orange2.png')} alt="icon" width="50"/></a>`
`14`	`14`
`15`		-We're happy to announce a change in the computation for the `scanned_partition_count` search audit index field. Previously, we were using incorrect computation to calculate the value for the `scanned_partition_count` field. With this change, the incorrect computation is fixed and now you will obtain the correct number of partitions scanned for the respective search.
	`15`	+We're happy to announce a change in the computation for the `scanned_partition_count` Search Audit Index field. Previously, we were using incorrect computation to calculate the value for the `scanned_partition_count` field. With this change, the incorrect computation is fixed and now you will obtain the correct number of partitions scanned for the respective search.