RFC : Dynamic Question-Set.

[mahesh-maney]

Requirement

For UPSMF (Uttar Pradesh State Medical Faculty), As a User, system should enable user to automate pulling of questions into question-set based on taxonomy association.
:map: Background

In UPSMF System, Most of the questions are sourced through a question bank. Users with creation access to the system are expected to create Blueprints. Blueprints are form of question Set which do not have questions explicitly marked against question set, rather have a criteria to pull these questions from question bank.

In order to enable automatic pulling of questions against a blue print. There is a need to build an extension to the system to enable the existing system to explicitly automate the question pulling into the Question-Set(s).

A detailed document is available here -> https://project-sunbird.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/UPSMF/pages/3261890567/Dynamic+Question-Set.

[Krishnaj20]

tagging @vrayulu @vinukumar-vs @pallakartheekreddy @coolbung @aks30 @pkranga @vijiurs for feedback

[Krishnaj20]

@mahesh-maney - QR is synonymous with QR codes in Sunbird context hence to avoid confusion please re-name it appropriately - for ex., question contributor. Can you also call out the reporting needs and how you are planning to address them please?

@vrayulu - Please review and share your feedback.

[aks30]

This can be an exciting feature, I see potentially this being used in preparing practice question sets, etc. Though cannot be used for where there has to be a result/comparison to be made at the end because each user might have a different test completely.

[abhay-samagra]

@kameshbhr - Seems like there is a ticket here already, closing the one in coKreat, and reviving this thread.

[kameshbhr]

@mahesh-maney @PoojaJManjooran @sajeshkayyath What is the status of this RFC? I see some open questions in the attached confluence document. I too have few questions on the functionality and tech design.

[PoojaJManjooran]

Once the open questions are addressed, we should be having a DC review for finalising the approach I guess

[abhay-samagra]

@mahesh-maney - Please update the documentation to close the open comments. That seems to be a blocker for having the DC review.

[mahesh-maney]

@abhay-samagra , @PoojaJManjooran , @sajeshkayyath , @kameshbhr I have replied to your comments on the RFC wiki page. Please check.