diff --git a/.github/workflows/reproduce-and-fix-issues-claude.yml b/.github/workflows/reproduce-and-fix-issues-claude.yml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..1f5774fb7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/workflows/reproduce-and-fix-issues-claude.yml
@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
+name: Claude Auto Issue Fix
+
+on:
+  issues:
+    types: [opened]
+
+jobs:
+  claude_auto_issue_fix:
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+
+    # Prevent multiple runs for the same issue
+    concurrency:
+      group: claude-auto-issue-${{ github.repository }}-${{ github.event.issue.number }}
+      cancel-in-progress: false
+
+    permissions:
+      contents: write
+      pull-requests: write
+      issues: write
+      id-token: write
+
+    steps:
+      - name: Checkout code
+        uses: actions/checkout@v6.0.1
+        with:
+          fetch-depth: 0
+
+      - name: Run Claude Code (auto issue handler)
+        uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1
+        with:
+          anthropic_api_key: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}
+          prompt: |
+            You are an autonomous coding agent running in CI for this repository.
+            This workflow runs automatically whenever a new GitHub issue is opened.
+
+            === Context ===
+            REPO: ${{ github.repository }}
+            ISSUE NUMBER: ${{ github.event.issue.number }}
+            ISSUE TITLE: ${{ github.event.issue.title }}
+            ISSUE URL: ${{ github.event.issue.html_url }}
+
+            ISSUE BODY:
+            ${{ github.event.issue.body }}
+
+            === Goal ===
+            Apply a strict “repro test → fix” methodology. Produce exactly ONE of these outcomes:
+            1) Repro PR + Fix PR (preferred for actionable bugs)
+            2) Repro PR only (if reproducible but cannot fix)
+            3) Comment-only “Needs info / Not actionable / Question answer draft”
+            No other outcomes.
+
+            === Hard rules (non-negotiable) ===
+            - Never claim reproduction unless a test fails due to a concrete behavioral assertion.
+            - Never use “does not throw / does not crash” as the primary assertion unless:
+              (a) the issue explicitly says throwing is the bug, AND
+              (b) the correct behavior is explicitly “should not throw”.
+            - Never “fix” by skipping, swallowing, or ignoring the problematic case
+              (e.g. guard clauses / try-catch that hides the error) unless the issue explicitly says that is correct.
+              Any conditional handling must still implement the intended behavior.
+            - Do not weaken tests to make them pass. Do not remove assertions. Do not skip tests. Do not mark flaky.
+            - Keep changes minimal and scoped. No refactors. No drive-by formatting.
+            - If expected behavior is unclear or not testable, STOP and request the minimum missing info.
+
+            === Step 0: Determine actionability ===
+            From the issue, extract:
+            - Expected behavior (must be explicit & testable)
+            - Actual behavior
+            - Repro steps / minimal example
+            If you cannot extract a testable expected behavior:
+            - Post a GitHub comment requesting the minimum missing details (inputs, expected outputs, versions, etc.)
+            - Stop (no PRs)
+
+            === Step 1: Reproduction test (behavioral oracle) ===
+            Create a minimal unit/integration test that asserts the expected behavior:
+            - Test name must describe intended behavior (NOT “reproduces issue #…”)
+            - Assert concrete outcomes: returned values, state transitions, emitted events, persisted data, etc.
+            - Add at least one “anti-noop” assertion that would fail if the code simply “does nothing”
+              (e.g. verify a state change, returned value, side effect).
+            - If the issue involves an error, prefer asserting correct error type/message or correct recovery/result.
+
+            === Step 2: Prove it reproduces on base ===
+            Run tests on base:
+            - Confirm the new test FAILS due to assertion mismatch (not due to broken test setup).
+            If the test passes on base:
+            - Do NOT fake a repro by weakening assertions.
+            - If the issue seems intermittent, attempt to make repro deterministic; otherwise comment “not reproducible” and stop.
+
+            Commit repro and open PR:
+            - Branch: ai/issue-${{ github.event.issue.number }}-repro
+            - Commit message: test: assert <expected behavior> (issue #${{ github.event.issue.number }})
+            - PR title: [repro] <short behavior> (issue #${{ github.event.issue.number }})
+            - PR body: link issue + what test asserts + how to run + observed failure
+
+            === Step 3: Fix (stacked on repro) ===
+            Create fix branch from repro branch:
+            - Branch: ai/issue-${{ github.event.issue.number }}-fix
+            Implement the minimal fix.
+            Validation:
+            - Previously failing test MUST now pass.
+            - Fix must not be a no-op.
+            - If you add guards/conditionals, justify why it's correct behavior (not hiding bug),
+              and ensure intended work still occurs.
+
+            Commit fix and open stacked PR:
+            - Commit message: fix: <short behavior> (issue #${{ github.event.issue.number }})
+            - PR title: [fix] <short behavior> (issue #${{ github.event.issue.number }})
+            - PR body: link issue + link repro PR + root cause + fix explanation + how to test
+
+            === If stuck ===
+            If you cannot fix without derailing:
+            - Still open the repro PR if it's valid (high value).
+            - Post a comment summarizing findings and blockers.
+            - Do NOT force a “fix” that silences symptoms.
+
+            === Quality checklist (must satisfy before marking fixed) ===
+            - [ ] Expected behavior asserted (not “no throw” unless truly correct)
+            - [ ] Test fails on base for the right reason
+            - [ ] Fix makes test pass without weakening assertions
+            - [ ] Fix is not “skip/swallow/ignore”
+            - [ ] Changes minimal and scoped
+
+            Proceed now.