Replies: 1 comment
-
Ah, just noticed in the last release Note Vinxi is a temporary dependency that will be replaced by a simple vite plugin or a dedicated Start CLI. That's great news! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I'm using router, query and start. I'm loving the experience (thank you maintainers), which is exceptional. The only source of frustration is when I hit issues in the server stack. My gut feeling is that much of this frustration is caused because Vinxi is acting as a layer of misdirection.
Because vinxi is a wrapper around nitro it can be confusing to see whether a problem is being caused by nitro, or the way vinxi is using nitro. This also adds a burden for nitro maintainers if developers think the issue is coming from nitro.
Its docs, which are my first port of call when trying to figure out how to handle a request or configure a deployment, are fairly sparse. This is a shame because nitro has really good and comprehensive documentation. It would be great to just use Nitro directly.
I appreciate that vinxi is doing some nice stuff to smooth out the DX using Vite on the server etc., I'm just a bit concerned that it is obscuring tools that have already matured. I wonder if there's a simpler approach.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions