Ability to use literal .
in route names
#3834
jasongitmail
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
-
this will come soon |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Flat routing is amazing and I want to keep using it. But there are situations where the route needs a file extension.
If there were a way to indicate that a particular
.
is intended as a literal in the route name, that'd solve it.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions