Technical bootcamp 6/14 to 6/15 Retrospective - Please answer the following questions:

[dkalmin]

What do we do well?

What could we have done better?

Ideas and suggestions?

[jimblizzard]

Did well: David did a great job of explaining the concepts, answering questions, giving demos. Also kept us on track so we were able to complete all the labs. We weren't able to stump him. :)

Could have done better: A couple of the labs had a couple of old instructions, but David was able to talk us through the changes.

Suggestions: free GH hat, t-shirt or hoodie for attendees. ;)

[cody-carlson]

What do we do well? I liked the end to end labs that built upon each other, it helped things flow.

What could we have done better? Updated documentation before lab start :)

Ideas and suggestions? I'd like to see multiple code samples to use, particularly an IaC code base to run this bootcamp with instead of dotnet.

--Swag would be cool, too!

[jjacinto23]

What do we do well? The sessions provided a good job mix of labs and presentations to outline key concepts. Flow of content was great as well - each module built upon each other.

What could we have done better? Although I was able to complete the labs and follow along, the lab documentation needs to be updated.

Ideas and suggestions? Like others mentioned - swag would be nice. Customer stories/use cases to contextualize the concepts as well.

[patrick-king]

What do we do well? Covers a lot of material quickly, no wasted time.

What could we have done better? Labs out of date is confusing.

Ideas and suggestions?