RST Rendering
#1263
Replies: 2 comments 9 replies
-
I don't have any plans for RST support, but it would be nice to have. Probably as an external package, i.e. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
-
So for future visitors of this discussion, I've made a library called |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
5 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
It would be really cool if Rich supported RST in the same way that it supports Markdown. I have a defopt CLI that I currently document using plain-text docstrings; however, it would be really cool if I could instead use RST to document my CLI and rely on Rich to correctly render it. Just like Markdown support, RST support wouldn't need to be complete; I think focusing on the low hanging fruit (e.g., code-block, headers, italics, bold, lists) would satisfy most common use-cases. What do you think? Would love to help working on it if you see value in the idea.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions