Thank you for your interest in contributing to this project! We welcome contributions from the geological, data science, and software development communities.
- Geological Data: Add more volcanoes, fault lines, or tectonic boundaries
- Model Improvements: Enhance ML algorithms or feature engineering
- Validation: Test predictions against real geological events
- Research: Add scientific papers or geological references
- Code Quality: Improve performance, readability, or documentation
- New Features: Add visualization tools, data sources, or analysis methods
- Bug Fixes: Report and fix issues in prediction algorithms
- Testing: Add unit tests or integration tests
- Tutorials: Create guides for specific use cases
- Examples: Add more location-specific analyses
- Explanations: Improve scientific explanations for general audiences
- Translations: Help make the project accessible to more users
# Fork and clone the repository
git clone https://github.com/your-username/earthquake-prediction-system.git
cd earthquake-prediction-system
# Create development environment
python3 -m venv dev_env
source dev_env/bin/activate
# Install dependencies
pip install -r requirements.txt
# Install development dependencies (if available)
pip install -r requirements-dev.txt
# Run tests to ensure everything works
python -m pytest tests/ -v- Create a branch for your feature:
git checkout -b feature/your-feature-name - Make your changes following our coding standards
- Test thoroughly to ensure nothing breaks
- Document your changes in code comments and README if needed
- Commit with clear messages:
git commit -m "Add: volcanic risk calculation for XYZ region"
- Follow PEP 8 Python style guidelines
- Use meaningful variable names (e.g.,
volcanic_risk_indexnotvri) - Add docstrings for all functions and classes
- Include type hints where appropriate
- Keep functions focused and small (< 50 lines when possible)
def calculate_volcanic_influence(self, lat: float, lon: float) -> tuple[float, float, int]:
"""
Calculate volcanic influence on earthquake risk for a given location.
Args:
lat (float): Latitude in decimal degrees
lon (float): Longitude in decimal degrees
Returns:
tuple: (volcanic_risk_index, nearest_volcano_distance, active_volcanoes_nearby)
Example:
>>> predictor = AdvancedEarthquakePredictor()
>>> risk, distance, count = predictor.calculate_volcanic_influence(45.0, -122.0)
>>> print(f"Risk: {risk:.2f}, Distance: {distance:.1f}km, Count: {count}")
"""- Unit tests for individual functions
- Integration tests for system components
- Data validation tests for geological accuracy
- Performance tests for large datasets
import pytest
from advanced_earthquake_predictor import AdvancedEarthquakePredictor
def test_volcanic_influence_calculation():
"""Test volcanic influence calculation for known locations."""
predictor = AdvancedEarthquakePredictor()
# Test near Mount St. Helens
risk, distance, count = predictor.calculate_volcanic_influence(46.2, -122.18)
assert risk > 0, "Should have volcanic risk near Mount St. Helens"
assert distance < 50, "Should be close to Mount St. Helens"
assert count > 0, "Should detect nearby active volcanoes"When adding new volcanoes, please include:
- Accurate coordinates (decimal degrees)
- Last eruption date (year, or negative for BCE)
- VEI rating (Volcanic Explosivity Index)
- Current status (active/dormant/extinct)
- Reliable sources for all data
- Verify coordinates against multiple sources
- Cross-reference eruption dates with official records
- Include source citations in code comments
- Test impact on existing predictions
Please include:
- Python version and operating system
- Complete error message and stack trace
- Steps to reproduce the issue
- Expected vs actual behavior
- Sample input data if relevant
Please describe:
- Use case and motivation
- Proposed implementation approach
- Potential impact on existing functionality
- Alternative solutions considered
- Update documentation for any new features
- Add or update tests for your changes
- Ensure all tests pass locally
- Update CHANGELOG.md with your changes
- Request review from maintainers
## Description
Brief description of changes made.
## Type of Change
- [ ] Bug fix
- [ ] New feature
- [ ] Documentation update
- [ ] Performance improvement
- [ ] Code refactoring
## Testing
- [ ] Unit tests pass
- [ ] Integration tests pass
- [ ] Manual testing completed
## Geological Accuracy
- [ ] Data sources verified
- [ ] Cross-referenced with scientific literature
- [ ] Impact on predictions assessed- Primary sources preferred (USGS, NOAA, geological surveys)
- Peer-reviewed publications for scientific methods
- Recent data (within 5 years when possible)
- Multiple source verification for critical data
- Cross-validation with independent datasets
- Comparison with existing geological models
- Documentation of assumptions and limitations
- Uncertainty quantification where appropriate
- GitHub Issues: For bugs and feature requests
- Discussions: For questions and general discussion
- Code Review: Maintainers will provide feedback on PRs
- Scientific Questions: Tag issues with
geological-sciencelabel
Contributors will be:
- Listed in CONTRIBUTORS.md
- Credited in release notes
- Thanked in documentation updates
- Invited to participate in project direction discussions
Thank you for contributing to advancing earthquake risk assessment tools! 🌍