Template gets "Package vignette without corresponding tangle output" with r-devel

[statnmap]

This problem is reproducible using {rig} with R-devel version locally on Ubuntu, when running devtools::check() on {fusen}.
However, this is not reproducible directly and interactively on the package "full" when extracted from the output.

Maybe an artifact of devtools::check() ?
Let's see if there are other packages with this same error where there is an explanation...

  ── Failure ('test-inflate-part2.R:440:9'): inflate() output no error ───────────
  check_out[["notes"]] (`actual`) not equal to "zero notes" (`expected`).
  
  lines(actual) vs lines(expected)
  - "checking package vignettes ... NOTE"
  - "Package vignette without corresponding tangle output:"
  - "  ‘get-started.Rmd’"
  + "zero notes"

[statnmap]

Search on https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=%22Package+vignette+without+corresponding+tangle+output%22&ia=web

https://cran.r-project.org › web › checks › check_results_shape.html
CRAN Package Check Results for Package shape
Check Details. Version: 1.4.6 Check: package vignettes Result: NOTE Package vignette without corresponding tangle output: 'shape.Rnw' Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64 Check: package vignettes Result: NOTE

https://cran.r-project.org › web › checks › check_results_adiv.html
CRAN Package Check Results for Package adiv
Check: package vignettes. Result: NOTE Package vignette without corresponding tangle output: 'adivGuide.Rnw' Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc. Version: 2.2. Check: re-building of vignette outputs.

https://cran.r-project.org › web › checks › check_results_HiCseg.html
CRAN Package Check Results for Package HiCseg
Version: 1.1 Check: package vignettes Result: NOTE Package vignette without corresponding tangle output: 'HiCseg.Rnw' Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc Version: 1.1 Check: compiled code Result: NOTE File 'HiCseg/libs/HiCseg.so': Found no calls to: 'R_registerRoutines', 'R_useDynamicSymbols' It is good practice to register ...

https://cran.r-project.org › web › checks › check_results_gglasso.html
CRAN Package Check Results for Package gglasso
OK. r-oldrel-windows-x86_64. 1.5. 15.00. 87.00. 102.00. OK. Check Details. Version: 1.5 Check: package vignettes Result: NOTE Package vignette without corresponding tangle output: 'Introduction_to_gglasso_package.Rmd' Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel ...

https://cran-archive.r-project.org › web › checks › 2024 › 2024-01-28_check_results_rich.html
CRAN Package Check Results for Package rich
Il y a 5 joursOK. r-oldrel-windows-x86_64. 1.0.1. 10.00. 141.00. 151.00. OK. Check Details. Version: 1.0.1 Check: package vignettes Result: NOTE Package vignette without corresponding tangle output: 'rich_introduction.Rmd' Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64 ...

https://cran.rstudio.com › web › checks › check_results_shape.html
CRAN Package Check Results for Package shape - RStudio
Check Details. Version: 1.4.6 Check: package vignettes Result: NOTE Package vignette without corresponding tangle output: 'shape.Rnw' Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc Check: package vignettes Result: NOTE Package vignette without corresponding tangle output: 'shape.Rnw' Flavors: r-devel-linux

[statnmap]

I think this is because we do not build documentation fully before running the check.
Indeed, if I compare package 'neat' where this CRAN error was fixed, we can see that the only interesting change is in the 'doc/' directory: R file associated with the vignette is now in the package.

I guess that :

• When running devtools::check() vignettes are fully built before the checks verify the vignette, and the "doc/" directory.

• In the case of 'fusen' unit tests, tests that fail on vignettes with "Package vignette without corresponding tangle output" are those where vignette documentation was not built before the checks. Indeed, we do not run devtools::check(), but rcmdcheck::rcmdcheck(), which does not build documentation before.

So, in the case of 'fusen', we can:

• ✅ either ignore to check the vignette with --ignore-vignettes:

 check_out <- rcmdcheck::rcmdcheck(dummypackage,
      quiet = TRUE,
      args = c("--no-manual", "--ignore-vignettes")
    )

• ❌ or build the 'doc/' directory before the 'rcmdcheck' : did not work

  devtools::build_vignettes()
# or
    tools::buildVignettes(dir = ".", tangle = TRUE)

• ❌ or run devtools::check() instead of 'rcdmcheck' : This is not possible to run a devtools::check() inside a devtools::check()

Error in `if (binary) {
    build_setup_binary(path, dest_path, args, needs_compilation)
} else {
    build_setup_source(path, dest_path, vignettes, manual, clean_doc, 
        args, needs_compilation)
}`: argument is not interpretable as logical
Backtrace:
    ▆
 1. └─devtools::check(path = ".", quiet = TRUE) at test-inflate-part1.R:203:5
 2.   ├─withr::with_envvar(...)
 3.   │ └─base::force(code)
 4.   └─pkgbuild::build(...)
 5.     └─pkgbuild:::build_setup(...)