|
| 1 | +# 📊 System Metrics & Performance Characteristics |
| 2 | +### Scalable Event-Driven Ride-Sharing Platform |
| 3 | +### Author: Corey Leath |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +This document summarizes the engineering metrics, performance characteristics, |
| 6 | +scalability targets, and reliability expectations of the distributed |
| 7 | +ride-sharing platform. These metrics mirror real-world targets used by |
| 8 | +companies such as Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash. |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +--- |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +# 🚦 1. Surge Pricing Engine Metrics |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +| Metric | Target | Notes | |
| 15 | +|--------|--------|-------| |
| 16 | +| Surge computation latency | **< 10 ms** | Pydantic validation + pure Python math operations. | |
| 17 | +| Event→surge propagation | **< 50 ms** | From incoming supply/demand event to API-visible multiplier. | |
| 18 | +| Cache update frequency | **1–2 updates/sec per zone** | Realistic for city-scale rider load. | |
| 19 | +| Supported zones | **50–200 active zones** | Expandable with sharding. | |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +--- |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +# 📡 2. Event Bus Throughput |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +| Metric | Target | Notes | |
| 26 | +|--------|--------|-------| |
| 27 | +| Events processed per second | **300–1,000 msg/sec** | AsyncIO concurrency + in-memory routing. | |
| 28 | +| Producer publish latency | **< 5 ms** | No network overhead for dev environment. | |
| 29 | +| Subscriber fan-out time | **< 20 ms** | Concurrent tasks via asyncio.gather. | |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +--- |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +# 🧠 3. Dispatch & Matching Engine Metrics |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +| Metric | Target | Notes | |
| 36 | +|--------|--------|-------| |
| 37 | +| Driver match latency | **< 100 ms** | Includes distance estimate + surge pricing lookup. | |
| 38 | +| ETA estimation time | **< 30 ms** | Lightweight heuristic without ML. | |
| 39 | +| Match throughput | **50–200 matches/sec** | Scales horizontally with worker count. | |
| 40 | +| Driver selection depth | **10–50 candidates** | Configurable ranking window. | |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +--- |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +# 📍 4. Driver Location Service Metrics |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +| Metric | Target | Notes | |
| 47 | +|--------|--------|-------| |
| 48 | +| Location update rate | **1 update/sec per driver** | Matches real-world telematics freq. | |
| 49 | +| Max active drivers | **1,000–5,000** | In-memory storage for dev. | |
| 50 | +| Query latency (driver lookup) | **< 10 ms** | Dict-based lookup + zone calculation. | |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +--- |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +# 🧾 5. Trip Management Metrics |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +| Metric | Target | Notes | |
| 57 | +|--------|--------|-------| |
| 58 | +| Trip creation time | **< 25 ms** | Includes ID generation + initial store. | |
| 59 | +| Trip completion processing | **< 40 ms** | Emits PaymentEvent. | |
| 60 | +| Trip lookup time | **< 5 ms** | In-memory store for dev. | |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +--- |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | +# ⚖️ 6. System Scalability Goals |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +| Dimension | Target | |
| 67 | +|-----------|--------| |
| 68 | +| Horizontal scaling | **Unlimited** with stateless microservices | |
| 69 | +| Load shedding | Supported via event queue backpressure | |
| 70 | +| Service instances | **1–50 replicas** depending on load | |
| 71 | +| Event throughput scaling | Optimized by partitioning topics | |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | +--- |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +# 🔒 7. Reliability & Fault Tolerance |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | +| Guarantee | Value | |
| 78 | +|-----------|--------| |
| 79 | +| API uptime target | **99.9%** | |
| 80 | +| Event loss tolerance | **Zero for core topics** (in production with Kafka) | |
| 81 | +| Graceful failover | Yes — independent microservices | |
| 82 | +| Circuit-breaker style isolation | Achieved through EventBus decoupling | |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +--- |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +# 🧪 8. Testing & CI Metrics |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +| Category | Status | |
| 89 | +|----------|--------| |
| 90 | +| Static typing | Pydantic model enforcement | |
| 91 | +| Unit tests | Architecture supports pytest | |
| 92 | +| Integration tests | Enabled through EventBus simulation | |
| 93 | +| Load testing | Achieved via PricingProducer event loops | |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | +--- |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | +# 🚀 9. Future Metric Enhancements |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | +- Replace EventBus with **Kafka or Redis Streams** for durability |
| 100 | +- Add **Prometheus + Grafana dashboards** |
| 101 | +- Add **percentile-based latency tracking (P95, P99)** |
| 102 | +- Add **driver heatmaps using H3 geospatial indexing** |
| 103 | +- Add **ML-based ETA prediction** |
| 104 | + |
| 105 | +--- |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | +This metrics document is designed to match Big Tech expectations for |
| 108 | +system-design clarity, performance transparency, and operational readiness. |
0 commit comments