Atypical background inferences #124
-
HI, I've made a trained model for PAINT with far-red imagers, but when using it to fit the experiment (from which the simulation parameters were measured), I get strange background inferences. Sometimes it's just a single value at 144 photons for all localizations, whereas I trained with 50 to 400 background, as seen on the param_run_647.yaml file here For the other channel (red imager), I get a broader distribution of background values but sometimes they are clipped at 144, whereas I trained with 50 to 250 background, as seen on the param_run_561.yaml file here What happens here? Seems to me that the network is incapable of inferring backgrounds above 150, despite being trained on larger values? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 8 replies
-
Wait, I just realized there's a Why is this? Why is it not overridden by the background range specified from processing the experiments with SMAP and getting the values from there? Similarly, the line So... should I redo both trainings (547 and 561) after changing these lines to something like |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Wait, I just realized there's a
bg_max: 144.0
line in the param_run.yaml files.
Why is this? Why is it not overridden by the background range specified from processing the experiments with SMAP and getting the values from there?
Similarly, the line
phot_max: 13000
could potentially create problems for PAINT as sometimes we get high photon numbers.
So... should I redo both trainings (547 and 561) after changing these lines to something like
bg_max: 400.0
phot_max: 30000
to avoid these problems, or are they just used at fitting?
@ASpeiser @Haydnspass