PostProcessing Spatial Integration #158
-
|
Good day, Happy new year! I have been wondering the reasoning that postprocessing spatial integration, which should drastically increase detection accuracy, is done outside the architecture (training/validation), but not done as part of the final layers before feeding into loss? Thank you, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Hey @tsuijenk, I think that's a standard procedure in many DL algorithms. oftentimes post-processing can not be backpropped through and it the other point is that training should ensure a good prediction that needs as little post-processing as possible. If you had a backproppable post-processing algorithm you can often end up in situations in which the model predictions worsens because the model "knows" that the predictions will be refined. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Hey @tsuijenk,
I think that's a standard procedure in many DL algorithms. oftentimes post-processing can not be backpropped through and it the other point is that training should ensure a good prediction that needs as little post-processing as possible. If you had a backproppable post-processing algorithm you can often end up in situations in which the model predictions worsens because the model "knows" that the predictions will be refined.