use original vi (shouldn't make a difference)

penelopeysm · penelopeysm · commit 717011b56b7d · 2025-10-22T18:41:25.000+01:00
diff --git a/ext/SliceSamplingTuringExt.jl b/ext/SliceSamplingTuringExt.jl
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ function SliceSampling.initial_sample(rng::Random.AbstractRNG, ℓ::Turing.LogDe
         # NOTE: This will sample in the unconstrained space.
         vi_spl = last(
             Turing.DynamicPPL.init!!(
-                rng, model, vi_spl, Turing.InitFromUniform()
+                rng, model, vi, Turing.InitFromUniform()
             ),
         )
         ℓp = Turing.DynamicPPL.getlogjoint_internal(vi_spl)

Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ function SliceSampling.initial_sample(rng::Random.AbstractRNG, ℓ::Turing.LogDe`
`51`	`51`	`# NOTE: This will sample in the unconstrained space.`
`52`	`52`	`vi_spl = last(`
`53`	`53`	`Turing.DynamicPPL.init!!(`
`54`		`- rng, model, vi_spl, Turing.InitFromUniform()`
	`54`	`+ rng, model, vi, Turing.InitFromUniform()`
`55`	`55`	`),`
`56`	`56`	`)`
`57`	`57`	`ℓp = Turing.DynamicPPL.getlogjoint_internal(vi_spl)`