-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Open
0 / 10 of 1 issue completedLabels
aggregationChanges to the aggregation algorithmChanges to the aggregation algorithmmetaIssues for tracking issuesIssues for tracking issues
Description
This contains some general notes and observations concerning the aggregation of the three (or more) Plains Cree dictionary resources.
A. For creating LEXC source, the dictionaries minimally need the following:
- Entry head that has been standardized according to SRO.
- Stem that has been standardized according to SRO.
- Lexical (inflectional) category following the classification scheme in CW.
B. For mapping the dictionary sources against each other, we need minimally the following:
- Entry head that has been standardized according to SRO.
- Lexical category following the classification scheme in CW.
A-B. Additional head-aches in regularizing the sources:
- CW uses the
accented-yin the entry heads (and stems), while MD and AECD have not. However, for comparison purposes theaccented-ycan be treated as aregular-y. Nevertheless, we would want to revise the pertinent fields in MD and AECD to have theaccented-y, where appropriate (head and stem).
C. Additional headaches concerning the English definitions that we would probably want to regularize:
- The sources use different conventions for indicating subject (CW: s/he vs. AECD: S/he vs. MD: He) and object (CW: s.o., s.t. vs. AECD: him/her, it vs. MD: him, it).
- The sources use different conventions in separating senses (CW: semicolon, AECD: semicolon, MD: numbering).
- The definitions contain Cree words and passages, that should be marked as such.
D. Varying sets of fields under entries that we may want to fill in:
- Besides stem and lexical category, CW has a number of fields that AECD and MD do not, e.g. the morphological decomposition.
- AECD has variants and alternatives listed with a different convention than CW, while MD has practically none.
Reactions are currently unavailable
Sub-issues
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
aggregationChanges to the aggregation algorithmChanges to the aggregation algorithmmetaIssues for tracking issuesIssues for tracking issues