Interface sets Tick Size too large for Dynamic fee pools on initialization

[mikeghen]

I made LP positions and the interface set the Tick spacing to 200 which I understand will make the price step 2%. This basically makes the pool completely useless.

I think there should be a way to set the tick spacing. I've observed the interface use 60, 200 and 10 for tick spacing when I initialize various pools in the frontend.

This is for a Uniswap V4 Pool, with a Hook attached, and a Dynamic Fee. It's a real struggle now that these 200 tick pools exist.

[plondon]

Moving this to discussion since this is a feature request and not a bug. We've triaged this feature request

[mikeghen]

Great, thanks again @plondon. My thought is to use 1 tick space if its hardcoded to a value, which is not gas efficient but will give the hook developer the most flexibility in terms of price granularity.

[mikeghen]

Actually, after some experiments, I think setting to 1 is probably not a good idea. If anything, maybe the default is 60, so the same as 0.3% fee tier. App says this is best for most pairs, so might be best for most dynamic fee hooks.