Skip to content

Conversation

@tbs17
Copy link
Contributor

@tbs17 tbs17 commented Jan 20, 2025

update unstructured-inference to 0.8.6 in requirements in extra-pdf-image.in

0.8.6 has pdfminer=20240706 (newer version)

@tbs17 tbs17 requested a review from plutasnyy January 20, 2025 21:28
@plutasnyy
Copy link
Contributor

  • pdfminer is not bumped to the version you would like it:
pdfminer-six==20231228
    # via
    #   -r ./extra-pdf-image.in
    #   pdfplumber

@plutasnyy
Copy link
Contributor

There is a chance it is blocked by https://github.com/Unstructured-IO/unstructured/pull/3881/files

@tbs17
Copy link
Contributor Author

tbs17 commented Jan 21, 2025

  • pdfminer is not bumped to the version you would like it:
pdfminer-six==20231228
    # via
    #   -r ./extra-pdf-image.in
    #   pdfplumber

i did first try to change it to 20240706 the newer version, however, it introduced pycrypto package which caused compatibility issue in CI so i reverted it back. I had all the checks passed when there was no update on pdfminer for once.

But now even if i reverted them back, it didn't pass. working on to see if there's anything else...

@tbs17 tbs17 marked this pull request as ready for review January 22, 2025 19:21
Copy link
Contributor

@ajjimeno ajjimeno left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like bumping a few libraries, which seems good.

@tbs17 tbs17 added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 22, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit afecf1b Jan 22, 2025
41 checks passed
@tbs17 tbs17 deleted the tshen/remove-layoutparser branch January 22, 2025 23:48
temp-adelyn pushed a commit to temp-adelyn/unstructured that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2025
update unstructured-inference to 0.8.6 in requirements in
extra-pdf-image.in

0.8.6 has pdfminer=20240706 (newer version)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants