|
| 1 | +# 🔐 Security Policy — SecretScout |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +<p align="center"> |
| 4 | + <img src="https://readme-typing-svg.demolab.com?font=Fira+Code&size=26&duration=3000&pause=900&color=00FF00¢er=true&vCenter=true&width=900&height=70&lines=Defensive+Security+Only;Responsible+Disclosure;Privacy+First+by+Design" alt="SecretScout Security Policy"> |
| 5 | +</p> |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +<p align="center"> |
| 8 | + <b>Security, privacy, and responsible disclosure</b><br> |
| 9 | + <em>Built for prevention • Designed for trust • Defensive by default</em> |
| 10 | +</p> |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +<p align="center"> |
| 13 | + <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Security-Policy-purple?style=flat-square" alt="Security Policy"> |
| 14 | + <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Disclosure-Responsible-green?style=flat-square" alt="Responsible Disclosure"> |
| 15 | + <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Mode-Offline--First-blue?style=flat-square" alt="Offline First"> |
| 16 | +</p> |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +<p align="center"> |
| 19 | + <a href="#-supported-versions">Supported Versions</a> • |
| 20 | + <a href="#-reporting-a-vulnerability">Reporting</a> • |
| 21 | + <a href="#-security-design">Security Design</a> • |
| 22 | + <a href="#-disclosure-process">Disclosure Process</a> |
| 23 | +</p> |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +--- |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +## 🛡️ Security Philosophy |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +> **SecretScout is a defensive security tool.** |
| 30 | +> It is designed to prevent accidental secret exposure — not to enable offensive or malicious activity. |
| 31 | +
|
| 32 | +Security and privacy are **core design principles** of this project: |
| 33 | +- No network calls |
| 34 | +- No telemetry |
| 35 | +- No secret exfiltration |
| 36 | +- Redaction by default |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +--- |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +## ✅ Supported Versions |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +The following versions currently receive security updates: |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +| Version | Supported | |
| 45 | +|--------|-----------| |
| 46 | +| 0.2.x | ✅ Yes | |
| 47 | +| < 0.2 | ❌ No | |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +Users are encouraged to stay on the latest release. |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +--- |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +## 🚨 Reporting a Vulnerability |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +If you believe you have found a security vulnerability, **please do not open a public issue**. |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | +### Responsible Disclosure |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +1. Go to **GitHub → Security → Advisories** |
| 60 | +2. Click **“New draft security advisory”** |
| 61 | +3. Include: |
| 62 | + - Clear description of the issue |
| 63 | + - Steps to reproduce (use **dummy secrets only**) |
| 64 | + - Potential impact |
| 65 | + - Suggested mitigation (if available) |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | +We aim to acknowledge valid reports as soon as possible. |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | +--- |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +## 🔍 What Qualifies as a Security Issue |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | +Examples of valid security issues include: |
| 74 | +- Crashes or exceptions caused by crafted input |
| 75 | +- Leakage of secret material via logs, output, or reports |
| 76 | +- Bypassing redaction or masking mechanisms |
| 77 | +- Unexpected file access outside the scan scope |
| 78 | +- Logic flaws that allow secrets to be missed or exposed |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +--- |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +## ❌ What Does NOT Qualify |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +The following are **not** considered security vulnerabilities: |
| 85 | +- False positives or false negatives in detection rules |
| 86 | +- Feature requests or usability issues |
| 87 | +- Performance concerns |
| 88 | +- Misuse of the tool |
| 89 | +- Reports containing **real secrets or credentials** |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +--- |
| 92 | + |
| 93 | +## 🔐 Handling of Secrets |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | +SecretScout is **privacy-first** by design: |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | +- 🔒 **Offline-only** — no outbound connections |
| 98 | +- 🧠 **In-memory processing** — secrets are not persisted |
| 99 | +- ✂️ **Redaction** — secrets are never printed in full |
| 100 | +- 🧾 **Cache safety** — cache stores fingerprints only, never raw secrets |
| 101 | + |
| 102 | +At no point does SecretScout transmit scanned content. |
| 103 | + |
| 104 | +--- |
| 105 | + |
| 106 | +## 🔄 Disclosure Process |
| 107 | + |
| 108 | +Once a vulnerability report is received and validated: |
| 109 | + |
| 110 | +1. Impact and severity are assessed |
| 111 | +2. A fix is prepared (if required) |
| 112 | +3. A patched release is published |
| 113 | +4. The reporter may be credited (optional) |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | +Disclosure timelines depend on severity and complexity. |
| 116 | + |
| 117 | +--- |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | +## ⚠️ Responsible Use |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +SecretScout is intended **exclusively for defensive security**. |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | +Any attempts to: |
| 124 | +- promote offensive usage, |
| 125 | +- collect or exfiltrate secrets, |
| 126 | +- or bypass user consent |
| 127 | + |
| 128 | +may result in refusal to support or removal of access. |
| 129 | + |
| 130 | +--- |
| 131 | + |
| 132 | +## 📄 Policy Updates |
| 133 | + |
| 134 | +This Security Policy may be updated as the project evolves. |
| 135 | +Changes will be documented in release notes when applicable. |
| 136 | + |
| 137 | +--- |
| 138 | + |
| 139 | +<p align="center"> |
| 140 | + <b>Thank you for helping keep SecretScout secure 🛡️</b><br> |
| 141 | + <sub>Defensive security starts with responsible disclosure.</sub> |
| 142 | +</p> |
0 commit comments