(mandatory and integral!) 10 reproduced heroes and no outlawed heroes petitioned (5 Invoker heroes vs 5 Invoker heroes and no every banned hero on both ranked match and unranked match for fairness)

[Thanaphol-Jitsongkram]

If 10 players could have designated the same 10 heroes on every match, the game would have been more balanced, more equal, more fair, etc. to every player on every match. Illustration: five Invoker heroes versus five Invoker heroes. Hence, each player had possessed each player’s craving. Likewise, each player could have frolicked a hero each player desired on every match. Likewise, if there had been no outlawed heroes (Every hero were accessible, every hero were not banned.), each player could have frolicked a hero each player craved to frolic. Hence, the dilemma resolved.

It could have been 2 Invoker heroes, 1 Lion hero and 1 Puck hero vs 2 Axe heroes, 2 Silencer heroes and 1 Viper hero, hence it could have resolved the hero designation dilemma in DOTA 2, assuredly.

[Thanaphol-Jitsongkram]

For fairnesses, justices, balances, natures, ecologies, environments, equalities, gods, creators, lords, effigies, etc. into each and every customer, each and every consumer, each and every player and each and every gamer, etc., presently; onwards.