chore: update readme

Author: AlexanderSchultheiss

README.md

@@ -3,17 +3,17 @@
 This artifact comprises the files and data to reproduce our evaluation of various patchers, including mpatch.
 
 ## Content
-Our sample of GitHub repositories and our dataset of mined patch scenarios is located in the [data](evaluation-workdir/data) directory of the evaluation's working directory.
+Our sample of GitHub repositories and our dataset of mined patch scenarios is located in the _evaluation-workdir/data_ directory of the evaluation's working directory.
 The sample and dataset are compressed as zip archives that have to be unpacked before they can be used.
 
-Our implementation of mpatch was written in Rust and can be found under [mpatch](mpatch). In its [README](mpatch/README.md), you can also find instructions on
+Our implementation of mpatch was written in Rust and can be found under _mpatch_. In its _mpatch/README.md_, you can also find instructions on
 how to generate the documentation for mpatch.
 
-The implementation of our evaluation setup can be found in the Java and Kotlin sources in the [src](src/main) folder. 
-The main file of the evaluation is [PatcherEvaluationMain.kt](src/main/kotlin/org/variantsync/evaluation/PatcherEvaluationMain.kt).
+The implementation of our evaluation setup can be found in the Java and Kotlin sources in the _src/main_ folder. 
+The main file of the evaluation is _src/main/kotlin/org/anon/evaluation/PatcherEvaluationMain.kt_. 
 
-Our scripts for applying the various metrics to the different patchers and analyzing the statistics can be found under [src/main/python](src/main/python/result_analysis). 
-The raw results of our evaluation are archived under [evaluation-workdir/results](evaluation-workdir/results)
+Our scripts for applying the various metrics to the different patchers and analyzing the statistics can be found under _src/main/python/result_analysis_. 
+The raw results of our evaluation are archived under _evaluation-workdir/results_
 
 ## Results without outliers
 In our paper, we mention that we re-analyzed our results after excluding outliers.