Skip to content

Commit ca1a1e3

Browse files
committed
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main'
2 parents 182ed40 + 63c9a71 commit ca1a1e3

File tree

1 file changed

+3
-3
lines changed

1 file changed

+3
-3
lines changed

README.md

Lines changed: 3 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,16 +1,16 @@
11
## Overview
22
🤖Machine learning (ML) promises dramatic speedups in characterizing the interior structure of exoplanets. Among various ML techniques, mixture density networks (MDNs) are quite appropriate to degenerate cases without sacrificing degenerate solutions. The MDN model requires large sets of data for training and yields multimodal probability distributions for various target variables through inputs of known quantities. Such a data-driven approach decouples interior model
3-
calculations from ML inferences and hence a well-trained ML model is capable of quickly characterizing planetary interiors. [Baumeister et al. (2020)](https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ab5d32) applied MDN-based ML to infer the distribution of possible thicknesses of each planetary layer for exoplanets up to 25 Earth masses, where MDN inference for one planet takes only few miliseconds compared with the inversion computing time of potentially several hours. In [Zhao & Ni (2021)](https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2021/06/aa40375-21/aa40375-21.html) and [Zhao & Ni (2022)](https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2022/02/aa42874-21/aa42874-21.html), the MDN was used to simultaneously predict the layer thicknesses and core properties of exoplanets including Earth-like planets and gas giants.
3+
calculations from ML inferences and hence a well-trained ML model is capable of quickly characterizing planetary interiors. [Baumeister et al. (2020)](https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ab5d32) applied MDN-based ML to infer the distribution of possible thicknesses of each planetary layer for exoplanets up to 25 Earth masses, where MDN inference for one planet takes only few miliseconds compared with the inversion computing time of potentially several hours. In [Zhao & Ni (2021)](https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2021/06/aa40375-21/aa40375-21.html) and [Zhao & Ni (2022)](https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2022/02/aa42874-21/aa42874-21.html), the MDN was used to simultaneously predict the layer thicknesses and core properties of exoplanets including rocky planets with Earth-like composition and gas giants.
44

55
In this work, We trained a machine learning model by using MDN algorithm to quickly and efficiently infer the interior structure of rocky exoplanets with **large compositional diversity.**
66

77
## Machine Learning Models
8-
We provide two machine learning models for uses: **Model A** trained on `[M, R, k2]` inputs and **Model B** trained on `[M, R, Fe/(Mg + Si), k2]` inputs. `M`, `R`, and `Fe/(Mg + Si)` represent the mass, radius, and bulk Fe/Si and Mg/Si abundance ratios of the planet, respectively, and `k2` is the tidal Love number. The relative refractory composition of rocky exoplanets can be well constrained by the elemental abundances of their host stars. In [Adibekyan et al. (2021)](https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abg8794), a strong correlation with a slope ∼5 was achieved between the Fe/(Mg+Si) abundance ratios of the planets and of their host stars,
8+
We provided two machine learning models for uses: **Model A** trained on `[M, R, k2]` inputs and **Model B** trained on `[M, R, Fe/(Mg + Si), k2]` inputs. `M`, `R`, and `Fe/(Mg + Si)` represent the mass, radius, and bulk Fe/Si and Mg/Si abundance ratios of the planet, respectively, and `k2` is the tidal Love number. The relative refractory composition of rocky exoplanets can be well constrained by the elemental abundances of their host stars. In [Adibekyan et al. (2021)](https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abg8794), a strong correlation with a slope ∼5 was achieved between the Fe/(Mg+Si) abundance ratios of the planets and of their host stars,
99

1010
$$(\frac{Fe}{Mg + Si})_{planet} = -1.35 \pm 0.36 + 4.84 \pm 0.92 \times (\frac{Fe}{Mg + Si})_{star}$$
1111

1212

13-
**Model A** has a better predictive accuracy, but its application is limited by some difficulties in measuring the tidal Love number `k2` of rocky exoplanets. **Model B** significantly breaks the density-composition degeneracy and accurately predicts the interior properties of rocky exoplanets. Along with the development of space-based observation technologies, orbital or shape observations could be possible to determine the Love number `k2` of rocky exoplanets and hence the machine learning models B and C would be applied more broadly.
13+
**Model A** has a better predictive accuracy, but its application is limited by some difficulties in measuring the tidal Love number `k2` of rocky exoplanets. **Model B** significantly breaks the density-composition degeneracy and accurately predicts the interior properties of rocky exoplanets. Along with the development of space-based observation technologies, orbital or shape observations could be possible to determine the tidal Love number `k2` of rocky exoplanets and hence the machine learning models **B** and **C** would be applied more broadly.
1414

1515
## Quick Start
1616
### Step 1:

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)