Rounding issue #386
Replies: 5 comments 3 replies
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
In general Wolfram Language takes care a lot about precision ![]() but it it's undefined it returns machine accurate number. That you can use later without loosing the accuracy |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
It's actually not easy to circumvent, I don't have alternatives I can exploit it seems : For "reporting" display use-cases it's quite a bummer ^^ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Try this one ![]() PS: I believe |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thank you, for reporting a value it's nice! Can't do further computation on this output but for a display purpose it's perfect ;) If I want to be able to use the output as input for further computations I came up with :
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello guys,
I did notice this weird behaviour when using Round :
Thank you, as always!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions